Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35395021›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

A randomized controlled trial comparing self-referred message to family-referred message promoting men's adherence to evidence-based guidelines on BRCA1/2 germline genetic testing: A registered study protocol.

Serena Petrocchi, Giulia Ongaro, Mariarosaria Calvello, Irene Feroce, Bernardo Bonanni, Gabriella Pravettoni

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04683068 (A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Self-referred Message to Family-referred Message Promoting Men's Adherence to Evidence-based Guidelines on BRCA1/2 Germline Genetic Testing), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04683068 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Self-referred Message to Family-referred Message Promoting Men's Adherence to Evidence-based Guidelines on BRCA1/2 Germline Genetic Testing: a Study Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorEuropean Institute of OncologyRan2021 to 2021Enrolled264ConditionsBRCA1 Mutation, BRCA2 Mutation, Psychosocial FactorsArmsMessage comparison
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Serena PetrocchiApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7223-8240
Giulia OngaroApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1287-4015
Mariarosaria CalvelloDivision of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2113-8503
Irene FeroceDivision of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Bernardo BonanniDivision of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Gabriella PravettoniApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis is a registered study protocol on a randomized controlled trial (RCT) testing an intervention aimed to improve men's adherence to evidence-based guidelines on BRCA1/2 germline genetic testing. BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (HBOC) increases the relative and absolute risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer and, to a lesser extent, prostate and pancreatic cancer. Men face BRCA-related cancer risks as women do, although with a different magnitude, and they may also transmit the mutations to their children. Notwithstanding, men are under-tested compared to women and the communication is not tailored on their needs. The present RCT applies principles of the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) in testing the psychological determinants of the men's adherence to evidence based guidelines on BRCA1/2 germline genetic and testing the efficacy of two messages.

methodsA total of 264 participants will be involved, among the men's relatives of women with verified germline mutations. The study entails a pre- post- evaluation with randomization of the participants in two conditions corresponding to the two messages. DISCUSSION: The expected results provide answers related to the impact of action self-efficacy, outcome expectancy (personal or familiar), risk perception, health risk aversion, intolerance of uncertainty, perceived barriers, and coping self-efficacy on informed decision-making. Data gathered from this study may inform health care providers, policy makers, and public health managers about the communication strategy for men and about the psychological variables influencing decision-making. TRAIL REGISTRATION: Name of the Registry: Clinical Trials. Trial registration number: NCT04683068. Date of registration: 16/12/2020. URL of trial registry record: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsBRCA1 ProteinChildFemaleGenetic TestingGerm CellsHumansMaleMutationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReferral and ConsultationBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID35395021
PMCPMC8992988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.