Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35394872›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

rDNA array length is a major determinant of replicative lifespan in budding yeast.

Manuel Hotz, Nathaniel H Thayer, David G Hendrickson, Elizabeth L Schinski, Jun Xu, Daniel E Gottschling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Dynamic evolution and hierarchical regulation of rDNA in polyploid oat.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Single-cell analyses identify independent aging processes that compete to determine cellular fate in budding yeast.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cell membrane asymmetries and cellular aging.The Biochemical journal · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Noncoding RNA Contribution to Aging and Lifespan.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genomic Instability and Epigenetic Changes during Aging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manuel HotzCalico Life Sciences LLC, South San Francisco, CA 94080.
Nathaniel H ThayerCalico Life Sciences LLC, South San Francisco, CA 94080.
David G HendricksonCalico Life Sciences LLC, South San Francisco, CA 94080.
Elizabeth L SchinskiCalico Life Sciences LLC, South San Francisco, CA 94080.
Jun XuCalico Life Sciences LLC, South San Francisco, CA 94080.
Daniel E GottschlingCalico Life Sciences LLC, South San Francisco, CA 94080.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complex processes and interactions that regulate aging and determine lifespan are not fully defined for any organism. Here, taking advantage of recent technological advances in studying aging in budding yeast, we discovered a previously unappreciated relationship between the number of copies of the ribosomal RNA gene present in its chromosomal array and replicative lifespan (RLS). Specifically, the chromosomal ribosomal DNA (rDNA) copy number (rDNA CN) positively correlated with RLS and this interaction explained over 70% of variability in RLS among a series of wild-type strains. In strains with low rDNA CN, SIR2 expression was attenuated and extrachromosomal rDNA circle (ERC) accumulation was increased, leading to shorter lifespan. Suppressing ERC formation by deletion of FOB1 eliminated the relationship between rDNA CN and RLS. These data suggest that previously identified rDNA CN regulatory mechanisms limit lifespan. Importantly, the RLSs of reported lifespan-enhancing mutations were significantly impacted by rDNA CN, suggesting that changes in rDNA CN might explain the magnitude of some of those reported effects. We propose that because rDNA CN is modulated by environmental, genetic, and stochastic factors, considering rDNA CN is a prerequisite for accurate interpretation of lifespan data.

Indexed as

Saccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSaccharomycetalesDNA ReplicationDNA, RibosomalLongevitySaccharomyces cerevisiaeDNA, RibosomalSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteinsagingmachine learningmicrofluidicsribosomal DNASaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID35394872
PMCPMC9169770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.