Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35394867›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Workplace inequality is associated with status-signaling expenditure.

Naomi Muggleton, Anna Trendl, Lukasz Walasek, David Leake, John Gathergood, Neil Stewart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Naomi MuggletonDepartment of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2ER, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6462-3237
Anna TrendlWarwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1994-4207
Lukasz WalasekDepartment of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7360-0037
David LeakeWarwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2361-9394
John GathergoodSchool of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom.
Neil StewartWarwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2202-018X

Funding

RCUK | Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) ES/N018192/1RCUK | Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) ES/P008976/1RCUK | Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) ES/V004867/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regional inequality is known to magnify sensitivity to social rank. This, in turn, is shown to increase people’s propensity to acquire luxury goods as a means to elevate their perceived social status. Yet existing research has focused on broad, aggregated datasets, and little is known about how individual-level measures of income interact with inequality within peer groups to affect status signaling. Using detailed financial transaction data, we construct 32,008 workplace peer groups and explore the longitudinal spending and salary data associated with 683,677 individuals. These data reveal links between people’s status spending, their absolute salary, salary rank within their workplace peer group, and the inequality of their workplace salary distribution. Status-signaling luxury spending is found to be greatest among those who have higher salaries, whose workplaces exhibit higher inequality, and who occupy a lower rank position within the workplace. We propose that low-rank individuals in unequal workplaces suffer status anxiety and, if they can afford it, spend to signal higher status.

Indexed as

digital footprintsincome inequalitysocial rankstatus signaling

Identifiers

PMID35394867
PMCPMC9169648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.