Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35394804›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2022

Working Memory Performance in Children With Developmental Language Disorder: The Role of Domain.

Caroline Larson, Susan Ellis Weismer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Less Versus More: The Effect of Recast Length in Treatment of Grammatical Errors.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caroline LarsonDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison.ORCID 0000-0001-7940-2528
Susan Ellis WeismerDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison.ORCID 0000-0003-3484-9910

Funding

WISCONSIN CENTER ON MENTAL RETARDATION: CORE SUPPORTP30HD003352 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DAVIDSON, RICHARD J · 1985 to 2015
$25.2M
Interdisciplinary Training in Speech-Language DisordersT32DC005359 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELLIS-WEISMER, SUSAN · 2002 to 2019
$3.7M
Processing-based causal factors in child language impairmentF31DC018704 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI LARSON, CAROLINE A · 2020 to 2020
$34k
NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD003352NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC018704NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC005359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study examined working memory in children with developmental language disorder (DLD). The overarching goal of this work was to integrate three primary processing-based hypotheses of DLD, (a) limited verbal working memory, (b) slowed processing speed, and (c) inefficient inhibition of interference, by using the serial-order-in-a-box-complex span (SOB-CS) computational model as our theoretical framework. We also examined the role of domain in working memory performance by varying the domain of interference and recall (i.e., verbal vs. nonverbal) task demands.

methodParticipants were 55 school-age children, 21 children with DLD and 34 age-matched typically developing (TD) peers (9-13 years old).

resultsFindings indicated that verbal and nonverbal working memory performance was poorer in the DLD than TD group. There was a modest benefit of dispersing interference and recall task demands across domains relative to task demands being within one domain, yet verbal interference affected performance to a greater degree than nonverbal interference in the DLD group.

conclusionsOverall findings supported a role for each of the processing-based hypotheses of DLD, albeit an incomplete role. In contrast, the SOB-CS model accounted for interrelationships among these processing-based factors and provided an explanation across patterns of findings. Thus, the SOB-CS model represents a useful step forward in explaining processing in children with DLD. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.19526179.

Indexed as

Language Development DisordersMemory, Short-TermAdolescentChildCognitionHumansLanguage TestsMental Recall

Identifiers

PMID35394804
PMCPMC9559775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.