Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35394618›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2022

The burden of a brain tumor: guiding patient centric care in neuro-oncology.

Ashlee R Loughan, Morgan Reid, Kelcie D Willis, Alexandria Davies, Rachel L Boutté, Sarah Barrett, Karen Lo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. The impact of a primary brain tumor diagnosis on caregivers: Insights from the patients' perspective.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  7. "Not me!" a qualitative, vignette-based study of nurses' and physicians' reactions to spiritual distress on neuro-oncological units.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Social relationships and relational pain in brain tumor patients and their partners.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ashlee R LoughanDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, VCU Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Medicine, 1201 East Marshall St, Richmond, VA, 23298-0037, USA. ashlee.loughan@vcuhealth.org.
Morgan ReidDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Kelcie D WillisDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Alexandria DaviesDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Rachel L BouttéDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Sarah BarrettVirginia Commonwealth University, School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
Karen LoVirginia Commonwealth University, School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBrain tumor patients report an overwhelming sense of uncertainty when navigating the course of their terminal disease. Historically, organizational experts and/or treating physicians have established neuro-oncology programs. However, given the disease burden and incurable nature of current medical treatments, patient-centric care should be prioritized alongside institutional and academic objectives. Integrating patient perspectives into interdisciplinary programmatic development can improve comprehensive care and empower patients to advocate for their own quality healthcare needs.

methodsData was derived from four focus groups with adult brain tumor patients (N = 15; M

resultsSix distinct themes emerged, where the frequency of each theme ranged from 12.5 to 23.3%. Specifically, patients discussed relational concerns, navigation of interdisciplinary care, neurobehavioral impacts, emotional responses to stressors, existential concerns, and caregiver support. A discussion of themes follows.

conclusionsIt is imperative that we include the patient perspective in the development of neuro-oncology programs; considering the quality of survival in addition to quantity. Neuro-oncology quality care themes identified were relational concerns, navigating interdisciplinary care, neurobehavioral impact, emotional response to stressors, existential concerns, and caregiver support. A paramount concentration for comprehensive neuro-oncology programs must include patients' quality needs.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsQuality of LifeAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CareReproducibility of ResultsBrain tumorFocus groupInterdisciplinaryPatient centricPRogram developmentQuality-of-life

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.