ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2021
Real-World LEAP Implementation.
Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel approaches to prevent or cure allergic diseases.Current opinion in immunology · 2025Review
- Alanine Scanning of the Unstructured Region of Ara h 2 and of a Related Mimotope Reveals Critical Amino Acids for IgE Binding.Molecular nutrition & food research · 2023Article
- Defining the window of opportunity and target populations to prevent peanut allergy.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2023Observational
- A systematic review of quality and consistency of clinical practice guidelines on the primary prevention of food allergy and atopic dermatitis.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2023Article
- Nutritional management of food allergies: Prevention and treatment.Frontiers in allergy · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewIn 2015, findings from the Learning Early About Peanut allergy (LEAP) trial provided the first convincing evidence that peanut allergy may be preventable through early peanut introduction into the infant diet. Here we discuss implementation of the LEAP study findings around the world and emerging evidence of the impacts on infant feeding and food allergy. RECENT
findingsThe LEAP findings led to rapid changes in allergy prevention guidelines internationally to recommend early peanut introduction. There is now emerging evidence that this has been followed by a substantial increase in early peanut introduction to infants. Studies investigating the impact of these changes in infant feeding practices on the prevalence of peanut allergy are underway. The LEAP trial represented a significant step forwards in food allergy prevention and new research over the past 5 years has provided insights into how best to implement this intervention in the real world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.