Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35394585›Full record

ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2022

ADC textural features in patients with single brain metastases improve clinical risk models.

Martha Nowosielski, Georg Goebel, Sarah Iglseder, Ruth Steiger, Lukas Ritter, Daniel Stampfl, Johanna Heugenhauser, Johannes Kerschbaumer, Elke R Gizewski, Christian F Freyschlag and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Martha NowosielskiDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria. Martha.Nowosielski@i-med.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0002-8068-315X
Georg GoebelDepartment of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Health Economics, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Sarah IglsederDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Ruth SteigerDepartment of Neuroradiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Lukas RitterDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Daniel StampflDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Johanna HeugenhauserDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Johannes KerschbaumerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Elke R GizewskiDepartment of Neuroradiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Christian F FreyschlagDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Guenther StockhammerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Christoph ScherflerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsIn this retrospective study we performed a quantitative textural analysis of apparant diffusion coefficient (ADC) images derived from diffusion weighted MRI (DW-MRI) of single brain metastases (BM) patients from different primary tumors and tested whether these imaging parameters may improve established clinical risk models.

methodsWe identified 87 patients with single BM who had a DW-MRI at initial diagnosis. Applying image segmentation, volumes of contrast-enhanced lesions in T1 sequences, hyperintense T2 lesions (peritumoral border zone (T2PZ)) and tumor-free gray and white matter compartment (GMWMC) were generated and registered to corresponding ADC maps. ADC textural parameters were generated and a linear backward regression model was applied selecting imaging features in association with survival. A cox proportional hazard model with backward regression was fitted for the clinical prognostic models (diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment score (DS-GPA) and the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA)) including these imaging features.

resultsThirty ADC textural parameters were generated and linear backward regression identified eight independent imaging parameters which in combination predicted survival. Five ADC texture features derived from T2PZ, the volume of the T2PZ, the normalized mean ADC of the GMWMC as well as the mean ADC slope of T2PZ. A cox backward regression including the DS-GPA, RPA and these eight parameters identified two MRI features which improved the two risk scores (HR = 1.14 [1.05;1.24] for normalized mean ADC GMWMC and HR = 0.87 [0.77;0.97]) for ADC 3D kurtosis of the T2PZ.)

conclusionsTextural analysis of ADC maps in patients with single brain metastases improved established clinical risk models. These findings may aid to better understand the pathogenesis of BM and may allow selection of patients for new treatment options.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesADC mapsPrognostic modelsSingle brain metastasesTextural features

Identifiers

PMID35394585
PMCPMC9117356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.