Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35394544›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental botany2022

Visualization of in vivo protein-protein interactions in plants.

Vivien I Strotmann, Yvonne Stahl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. FRET-FLIM: Unveiling Transcription Factor Interactions in Plants.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  4. TurboID-Based Proximity Labeling in Plants.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Green Fluorescent Protein SELEX: Immobilization Chemistry and His-Tag Epitope Bias.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Is GCR1 the GPR157 of plants?Plant physiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vivien I StrotmannInstitute for Developmental Genetics, Heinrich-Heine University, Universitätsstr. 1, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Yvonne StahlInstitute for Developmental Genetics, Heinrich-Heine University, Universitätsstr. 1, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7543-5186

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 1212/4-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular processes depend on the concerted and dynamic interactions of proteins, either by one-on-one interactions of the same or different proteins or by the assembly of larger protein complexes consisting of many different proteins. Here, not only the protein-protein interaction (PPI) itself, but also the localization and activity of the protein of interest (POI) within the cell is essential. Therefore, in all cell biological experiments, preserving the spatio-temporal state of one POI relative to another is key to understanding the underlying complex and dynamic regulatory mechanisms in vivo. In this review, we examine some of the applicable techniques to measure PPIs in planta as well as recent combinatorial advances of PPI methods to measure the formation of higher order complexes with an emphasis on in vivo imaging techniques. We compare the different methods and discuss their benefits and potential pitfalls to facilitate the selection of appropriate techniques by providing a comprehensive overview of how to measure in vivo PPIs in plants.

Indexed as

Fluorescence Resonance Energy TransferProtein Interaction MappingPlantsBiFCFRETFRET-APBFRET-FLIMin plantain vivoprotein–protein interaction (PPI)splitLuc

Identifiers

PMID35394544
PMCPMC9232200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.