Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35394437›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2022

Stigmatizing Attitudes Across Cybersuicides and Offline Suicides: Content Analysis of Sina Weibo.

Ang Li, Dongdong Jiao, Tingshao Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ang LiDepartment of Psychology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9222-3521
Dongdong JiaoNational Computer System Engineering Research Institute of China, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3276-0413
Tingshao ZhuKey Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0020-3812

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe new reality of cybersuicide raises challenges to ideologies about the traditional form of suicide that does not involve the internet (offline suicide), which may lead to changes in audience's attitudes. However, knowledge on whether stigmatizing attitudes differ between cybersuicides and offline suicides remains limited.

objectiveThis study aims to consider livestreamed suicide as a typical representative of cybersuicide and use social media data (Sina Weibo) to investigate the differences in stigmatizing attitudes across cybersuicides and offline suicides in terms of attitude types and linguistic characteristics.

methodsA total of 4393 cybersuicide-related and 2843 offline suicide-related Weibo posts were collected and analyzed. First, human coders were recruited and trained to perform a content analysis on the collected posts to determine whether each of them reflected stigma. Second, a text analysis tool was used to automatically extract a number of psycholinguistic features from each post. Subsequently, based on the selected features, a series of classification models were constructed for different purposes: differentiating the general stigma of cybersuicide from that of offline suicide and differentiating the negative stereotypes of cybersuicide from that of offline suicide.

resultsIn terms of attitude types, cybersuicide was observed to carry more stigma than offline suicide (χ

conclusionsThe way people perceive cybersuicide differs from how they perceive offline suicide. The results of this study have implications for reducing the stigma against suicide.

Indexed as

Social MediaSuicideAttitudeFemaleHumansLinguisticsMaleSocial Stigmacybersuicidelinguistic analysislivestreamed suicidesocial mediastigma

Identifiers

PMID35394437
PMCPMC9034432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.