Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35394433›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

A Veteran-Centric Web-Based Decision Aid for Lung Cancer Screening: Usability Analysis.

Marilyn M Schapira, Sumedha Chhatre, Jason M Prigge, Jessica Meline, Dana Kaminstein, Keri L Rodriguez, Liana Fraenkel, Jeffrey D Kravetz, Jeff Whittle, Lori A Bastian and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Patient Perspectives on a Patient-Facing Tool for Lung Cancer Screening.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Marilyn M SchapiraCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3775-9462
Sumedha ChhatreCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4718-0198
Jason M PriggeCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2217-9737
Jessica MelineCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3692-5403
Dana KaminsteinCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1569-3052
Keri L RodriguezCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1477-3659
Liana FraenkelDepartment of Rheumatology, Berkshire Health Systems, Pittsfield, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6148-610X
Jeffrey D KravetzDepartment of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1493-0941
Jeff WhittleClement J Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9544-838X
Lori A BastianDepartment of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2874-6405
Anil VachaniDepartment of Medicine, Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3871-8697
Scott AkersDepartment of Radiology, Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0168-7110
Susan SchrandDepartment of Medicine, Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7088-9795
Jennifer V IbarraVA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8911-5098
Onur AsanThe Stevens Institute of Technology, School of Systems and Enterprise, Hoboken, NJ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9239-3723
Philadelphia VA Medical Center · USYale University · USMilwaukee VA Medical Center · USStevens Institute of Technology · USVA Connecticut Healthcare System · USVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System · US

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES013508 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Trevor M Penning · 2006 to 2026
$35.3M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWeb-based tools developed to facilitate a shared decision-making (SDM) process may facilitate the implementation of lung cancer screening (LCS), an evidence-based intervention to improve cancer outcomes. Veterans have specific risk factors and shared experiences that affect the benefits and potential harms of LCS and thus may value a veteran-centric LCS decision tool (LCSDecTool).

objectiveThis study aims to conduct usability testing of an LCSDecTool designed for veterans receiving care at a Veteran Affairs medical center.

methodsUsability testing of the LCSDecTool was conducted in a prototype version (phase 1) and a high-fidelity version (phase 2). A total of 18 veterans and 8 clinicians participated in phase 1, and 43 veterans participated in phase 2. Quantitative outcomes from the users included the System Usability Scale (SUS) and the End User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS) in phase 1 and the SUS, EUCS, and Patient Engagement scale in phase 2. Qualitative data were obtained from observations of user sessions and brief interviews. The results of phase 1 informed the modifications of the prototype for the high-fidelity version. Phase 2 usability testing took place in the context of a pilot hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial.

resultsIn the phase 1 prototype usability testing, the mean SUS score (potential range: 0-100) was 81.90 (SD 9.80), corresponding to an excellent level of usability. The mean EUCS score (potential range: 1-5) was 4.30 (SD 0.71). In the phase 2 high-fidelity usability testing, the mean SUS score was 65.76 (SD 15.23), corresponding to a good level of usability. The mean EUCS score was 3.91 (SD 0.95); and the mean Patient Engagement scale score (potential range 1 [low] to 5 [high]) was 4.62 (SD 0.67). The median time to completion in minutes was 13 (IQR 10-16). A thematic analysis of user statements documented during phase 2 high-fidelity usability testing identified the following themes: a low baseline level of awareness and knowledge about LCS increased after use of the LCSDecTool; users sought more detailed descriptions about the LCS process; the LCSDecTool was generally easy to use, but specific navigation challenges remained; some users noted difficulty understanding medical terms used in the LCSDecTool; and use of the tool evoked veterans' struggles with prior attempts at smoking cessation.

conclusionsOur findings support the development and use of this eHealth technology in the primary care clinical setting as a way to engage veterans, inform them about a new cancer control screening test, and prepare them to participate in an SDM discussion with their provider.

Indexed as

cancer screeningdecision aidimplementationlung cancer screeningmobile phonepatient engagementshared decision-makingusabilityveterans

Identifiers

PMID35394433
PMCPMC9034418
OpenAlexW4205998990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.