ArticleGlobal spine journal2022
Percutaneous Posterior Cervical Pedicle Instrumentation (C1 to C7) With Navigation Guidance: Early Series of 27 Cases.
Article in Global spine journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fully percutaneous, navigation-assisted cervical pedicle screw instrumentation: technical note and a report of safety and accuracy.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- The Woodpecker variable-speed drilling protocol for robot-assisted subaxial cervical pedicle screw placement: technique and a consecutive series of 1027 screws.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Intraoperative Navigation in Cervical Spine Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Minimally invasive cervical spine stabilization: A multicenter study of completely percutaneous pedicle screw-rod instrumentation.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- A new minimally invasive cervical pedicle screw (CPS) fixation system using intra-operative computed tomography-guided navigation.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2025Article
- Comparison of open and percutaneous navigated pedicle screw placement for traumatic injuries of the subaxial cervical spine.Brain & spine · 2025Article
- Navigated percutaneous placement of cervical pedicle screws: An anatomical feasibility study.Brain & spine · 2025Article
- Comparison of different imaging devices and navigation systems for cervical pedicle screw placement: an experimental study on screw accuracy, screw placement time and radiation dose.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Mazor X robot-assisted upper and lower cervical pedicle screw fixation: a case report and literature review.BMC geriatrics · 2024Review
- Evolution of Cervical Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Current Progress and Future Directions-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Anterior cervical osteotomy of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis lesions with computer-assisted navigation surgery: A case report.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
- Returning to our roots: reappraisal of historical trajectories for cervical lateral mass screws by Roy-Camille (1987), Magerl (1987), and An (1991), and cervical pedicle screws by Abumi (1994).Neurosurgical review · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designThis is a technique paper describing minimally invasive, navigated, percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the cervical spine. In addition, we include a retrospective feasibility analysis of our initial experience with 27 patients undergoing this procedure.
objectiveThe purpose of this study is to describe the technique of MIS navigated percutaneous cervical pedicle screw instrumentation and to report our initial experience.
methodsThis is a retrospective review of 27 patients undergoing MIS navigated percutaneous posterior cervical pedicle screw fixation at 2 institutions. We describe the technique and report the radiographic outcomes and all intraoperative and postoperative complications.
resultsA total of 27 patients underwent MIS navigated percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. Indications included odontoid fracture, subaxial fracture dislocations and burst fracture, pathological fracture, and degenerative spondylosis. There were no nerve root or vascular injuries. There were no spinal cord injuries. Two screws required repositioning intraoperatively, and 1 patient required reoperation for symptomatic malpositioned screw.
conclusionsMIS navigated percutaneous posterior pedicle screw fixation can be performed safely. These constructs are biomechanically superior with neurovascular complication rates comparable to traditional lateral mass screw technique. While the current indications for this technique are relatively limited, the evolution of MIS cervical decompression techniques as well as navigation and robotics will provide an expanded role for percutaneous cervical pedicle screw instrumentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.