Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35393491›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2022

Global population genomic signature of Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) supports complex introduction events across the Old World.

Wee Tek Tay, Rahul V Rane, Amanda Padovan, Tom K Walsh, Samia Elfekih, Sharon Downes, Kiwong Nam, Emmanuelle d'Alençon, Jianpeng Zhang, Yidong Wu and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Genomic investigations of successful invasions: the picture emerging from recent studies.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Oral Exposure toInsects · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Wee Tek TayCSIRO Black Mountain Laboratories, Clunies Ross Street, Canberra, ACT 2602, Australia. weetek.tay@csiro.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8451-0811
Rahul V RaneCSIRO Black Mountain Laboratories, Clunies Ross Street, Canberra, ACT 2602, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4616-6244
Amanda PadovanCSIRO Black Mountain Laboratories, Clunies Ross Street, Canberra, ACT 2602, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8118-9137
Tom K WalshCSIRO Black Mountain Laboratories, Clunies Ross Street, Canberra, ACT 2602, Australia.
Samia ElfekihCSIRO Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Sharon DownesCSIRO FD McMaster Laboratories, New England Highway, Armidale, NSW2350, Australia.
Kiwong NamDGIMI, Université Montpellier, INRAE, Montpellier, France.
Emmanuelle d'AlençonDGIMI, Université Montpellier, INRAE, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8994-0119
Jianpeng ZhangCollege of Plant Protection Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Yidong WuCollege of Plant Protection Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3456-3373
Nicolas NègreDGIMI, Université Montpellier, INRAE, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9727-3416
Daniele KunzGordon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1QN, UK.
Darren J KriticosCSIRO Black Mountain Laboratories, Clunies Ross Street, Canberra, ACT 2602, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2599-8105
Cecilia CzepakUniversidade Federal de Goiáss, Escola de Agronomia, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Michael H OtimNational Crops Resources Research Institute, Namulonge, Kampala, Uganda.
Karl H J GordonCSIRO Black Mountain Laboratories, Clunies Ross Street, Canberra, ACT 2602, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Native to the Americas, the invasive Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm; FAW) was reported in West Africa in 2016, followed by its chronological detection across the Old World and the hypothesis of an eastward Asia expansion. We explored population genomic signatures of American and Old World FAW and identified 12 maternal mitochondrial DNA genome lineages across the invasive range. 870 high-quality nuclear single nucleotide polymorphic DNA markers identified five distinct New World population clusters, broadly reflecting FAW native geographical ranges and the absence of host-plant preferences. We identified unique admixed Old World populations, and admixed and non-admixed Asian FAW individuals, all of which suggested multiple introductions underpinning the pest's global spread. Directional gene flow from the East into eastern Africa was also detected, in contrast to the west-to-east spread hypothesis. Our study demonstrated the potential of population genomic approaches via international partnership to address global emerging pest threats and biosecurity challenges.

Indexed as

Gene FlowMetagenomicsSpodopteraAfrica, EasternAnimalsAsia

Identifiers

PMID35393491
PMCPMC8989990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.