ArticleScientific reports2022
Characterization of spatiotemporal electroactive anodic biofilm activity distribution using 1D simulations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Activity distribution limitation in electroactive biofilm remains an unclear phenomenon. Some observations using confocal microscopy have shown notable difference between activity close to the anode and activity at the liquid interface. A numerical model is developed in this work to describe biofilm growth and local biomass segregation in electroactive biofilm. Under our model hypothesis, metabolic activity distribution in the biofilm results from the competition between two limiting factors: acetate diffusion and electronic conduction in the biofilm. Influence of inactive biomass fraction (i.e. non-growing biomass fraction) properties (such as conductivity and density) is simulated to show variation in local biomass distribution. Introducing a dependence of effective diffusion to local density leads to a drastic biomass fraction segregation. Increasing density of inactive fraction reduces significantly acetate diffusion in biofilm, enhances biomass activity on the outer layer (liquid/biofilm interface) and maintains inner core largely inactive. High inactive fraction conductivity enhances biomass activity in the outer layer and enhances current production. Hence, investment in extracellular polymer substance (EPS), anchoring redox components, is benefit for biofilm electroactivity. However, under our model hypothesis it means that conductivity should be two order lower than biofilm conductivity reported in order to observe inner core active biomass segregation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.