Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35393445›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Histological and chemical diagnosis of a combat lesion in Triceratops.

Ruggero D'Anastasio, Jacopo Cilli, Flavio Bacchia, Federico Fanti, Giacomo Gobbo, Luigi Capasso

Erratum issuedAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruggero D'AnastasioDepartment of Medicine and Aging Science, 'G. D'Annunzio' University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy. r.danastasio@unich.it.
Jacopo CilliDepartment of Medicine and Aging Science, 'G. D'Annunzio' University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Flavio BacchiaZoic Limited Liability Company, Trieste, Italy.
Federico FantiDepartment of Biological, Geological, and Environmental Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giacomo GobboDepartment of Biological, Geological, and Environmental Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Luigi CapassoDepartment of Medicine and Aging Science, 'G. D'Annunzio' University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the collective imagination derived from scientific and popular literature, Triceratops often faced each other in combat. Thus, from the second half of the twentieth century, these ceratopsids were described as pugnacious animals. This arises primarily from the interpretation of extracranial fenestrae in ceratopsids being the result of combat trauma. However, the diagnosis of the traumatic nature of these anatomical variants of their neck frill requires evidence of bone healing and remodelling by microscopy analysis. Here, we present the case of the Triceratops horridus known as Big John, which is one of the largest specimens discovered in the Hell Creek Formation (Upper Cretaceous; MT, USA). Its right squamosal bone shows an extrafenestra with irregular margins and signs of inflammation. Microscopy analysis revealed newly formed and healing bone, with histological signs typical of the bone remodelling phase. Chemical analysis revealed sulphur that was derived from glycosaminoglycan's and sulphated glycoproteins of the preosseous osteoid substance present in the healing phases of a bone trauma. Histological and microanalytical analyses confirm that the squamosal fenestra of Big John is the result of a traumatic event, which might indeed have occurred during combat with another Triceratops.

Indexed as

DinosaursAnimalsBone and BonesFossilsRestraint, Physical

Identifiers

PMID35393445
PMCPMC8990019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.