Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35393434›Full record

ArticleScientific data2022

Emognition dataset: emotion recognition with self-reports, facial expressions, and physiology using wearables.

Stanisław Saganowski, Joanna Komoszyńska, Maciej Behnke, Bartosz Perz, Dominika Kunc, Bartłomiej Klich, Łukasz D Kaczmarek, Przemysław Kazienko

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. I DARE: IULM Dataset of Affective Responses.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stanisław SaganowskiWroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Department of Artificial Intelligence, Wrocław, 50-370, Poland. stanislaw.saganowski@pwr.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0003-3607-5920
Joanna KomoszyńskaWroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Department of Artificial Intelligence, Wrocław, 50-370, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1018-5574
Maciej BehnkeWroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Department of Artificial Intelligence, Wrocław, 50-370, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2455-4556
Bartosz PerzWroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Department of Artificial Intelligence, Wrocław, 50-370, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9940-5117
Dominika KuncWroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Department of Artificial Intelligence, Wrocław, 50-370, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2918-0423
Bartłomiej KlichWroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Department of Artificial Intelligence, Wrocław, 50-370, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7840-1830
Łukasz D KaczmarekAdam Mickiewicz University, Faculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Poznan, 61-664, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5565-8334
Przemysław KazienkoWroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Department of Artificial Intelligence, Wrocław, 50-370, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5868-356X

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki (National Science Centre) 2016/21/B/ST6/01463Narodowe Centrum Nauki (National Science Centre) 2020/37/B/ST6/03806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Emognition dataset is dedicated to testing methods for emotion recognition (ER) from physiological responses and facial expressions. We collected data from 43 participants who watched short film clips eliciting nine discrete emotions: amusement, awe, enthusiasm, liking, surprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness. Three wearables were used to record physiological data: EEG, BVP (2x), HR, EDA, SKT, ACC (3x), and GYRO (2x); in parallel with the upper-body videos. After each film clip, participants completed two types of self-reports: (1) related to nine discrete emotions and (2) three affective dimensions: valence, arousal, and motivation. The obtained data facilitates various ER approaches, e.g., multimodal ER, EEG- vs. cardiovascular-based ER, discrete to dimensional representation transitions. The technical validation indicated that watching film clips elicited the targeted emotions. It also supported signals' high quality.

Indexed as

EmotionsFacial ExpressionAngerHumansSadnessSelf Report

Identifiers

PMID35393434
PMCPMC8989970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.