Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35393427›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

DNA methylation in newborns conceived by assisted reproductive technology.

Siri E Håberg, Christian M Page, Yunsung Lee, Haakon E Nustad, Maria C Magnus, Kristine L Haftorn, Ellen Ø Carlsen, William R P Denault, Jon Bohlin, Astanand Jugessur and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
34.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Genetic and Epigenetic Risks of Male Infertility in ART.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Siri E HåbergCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. box 222 Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway. Siri.haberg@fhi.no.
Christian M PageCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. box 222 Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway.
Yunsung LeeCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. box 222 Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2512-1082
Haakon E NustadCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. box 222 Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway.
Maria C MagnusCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. box 222 Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway.
Kristine L HaftornCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. box 222 Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway.
Ellen Ø CarlsenCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. box 222 Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway.
William R P DenaultCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. box 222 Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway.
Jon BohlinCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. box 222 Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0992-1311
Astanand JugessurCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. box 222 Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway.
Per MagnusCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. box 222 Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway.
Håkon K GjessingCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. box 222 Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway.
Robert LyleCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. box 222 Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NOOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) may affect fetal development through epigenetic mechanisms as the timing of ART procedures coincides with the extensive epigenetic remodeling occurring between fertilization and embryo implantation. However, it is unknown to what extent ART procedures alter the fetal epigenome. Underlying parental characteristics and subfertility may also play a role. Here we identify differences in cord blood DNA methylation, measured using the Illumina EPIC platform, between 962 ART conceived and 983 naturally conceived singleton newborns. We show that ART conceived newborns display widespread differences in DNA methylation, and overall less methylation across the genome. There were 607 genome-wide differentially methylated CpGs. We find differences in 176 known genes, including genes related to growth, neurodevelopment, and other health outcomes that have been associated with ART. Both fresh and frozen embryo transfer show DNA methylation differences. Associations persist after controlling for parents' DNA methylation, and are not explained by parental subfertility.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationInfertilityFertilizationFertilization in VitroHumansInfant, NewbornReproductive Techniques, Assisted

Identifiers

PMID35393427
PMCPMC8989983
OpenAlexW4223444973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.