Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35393357›Full record

ArticleBMJ military health2023

Cognitive performance of military men and women during prolonged load carriage.

Nicola C Armstrong, S J R Smith, D Risius, D Doyle, S L Wardle, J P Greeves, J R House, M Tipton, M Lomax

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ military health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nicola C ArmstrongHuman Sciences Group, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Salisbury, UK ncarmstrong@dstl.gov.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8088-0279
S J R SmithHuman Sciences Group, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Fareham, UK.
D RisiusHuman Sciences Group, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Salisbury, UK.
D DoyleHuman Sciences Group, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Salisbury, UK.
S L WardleDepartment of Army Health and Physical Performance Research, UK Ministry of Defence, Andover, UK.
J P GreevesDepartment of Army Health and Physical Performance Research, UK Ministry of Defence, Andover, UK.
J R HouseSchool of Sport, Health and Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
M TiptonSchool of Sport, Health and Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
M LomaxSchool of Sport, Health and Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
Defence Science and Technology Laboratory · GBUniversity of Portsmouth · GBMinistry of Defence · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study evaluated cognitive workload in soldiers undertaking a long duration march wearing different loads.

methodsMilitary participants (n=12 men and n=10 women) performed four 3-hour loaded marches (12.25 km at 4.9 km/hour) wearing either 21 kg, 26 kg, 33 kg or 43 kg. During the march, accuracy and response time were measured using the verbal working memory n-back test (0, 1, 2 and 3) and two bespoke Go/No Go tests (visual/auditory) to assess inhibition of a pre-potent response.

resultsThe physical demands of the march increased with load and march duration but remained at moderate intensity. N-back test accuracy ranged from 74% to 98% in men and 62% to 98% in women. Reduced accuracy was observed as load and time increased. Accuracy during the visual Go/No Go test also reduced with load, accuracy ranged from 69% to 89% in men and 65% to 90% in women. No differences due to load or time were observed during completion of the auditory Go/No Go task; accuracy ranged from 93% to 97% in men and 77% to 95% in women. A number of participants were unable to complete the march due to discomfort. Reports of discomfort were more frequent in women, which may have contributed to the greater reductions in accuracy observed.

conclusionThese data provide further evidence that cognitive performance of military personnel can be affected during long duration loaded marching. Women reported discomfort from equipment more frequently than men, which may make them more susceptible to declines in cognitive performance. These findings highlight important considerations for equipment procurement.

Indexed as

Military PersonnelCognitionFemaleHumansMaleTime FactorsWalkingWeight-Bearingeducation & trainingphysiologysports medicine

Identifiers

PMID35393357
PMCPMC9887367
OpenAlexW4226153107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.