Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35393331›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Understanding engagement with Brown Buttabean Motivation, an Auckland grassroots, Pacific-led holistic health programme: a qualitative study.

Fa'asisila Savila, Paea Leakehe, Warwick Bagg, Matire Harwood, Dave Letele, Anele Bamber, Boyd Swinburn, Felicity Goodyear-Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fa'asisila SavilaPacific Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Paea LeakehePacific Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Warwick BaggSchool of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1401-8191
Matire HarwoodGeneral Practice & Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Dave LeteleBBM Motivation, Auckland, New Zealand.
Anele BamberBBM, Auckland, New Zealand.
Boyd SwinburnEpidemiology & Biostatistics, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-2131-045X
Felicity Goodyear-SmithGeneral Practice & Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand f.goodyear-smith@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-6657-9401

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim was to understand how participants engage with Brown Buttabean Motivation (BBM) a grassroots, Pacific-led holistic health programme and the meaning it has in their lives. The objectives were to explore the impact BBM had on all aspects of their health and well-being, what attracted them, why they stayed, identify possible enablers and barriers to engagement, and understand impact of COVID-19 restrictions.

designQualitative study with thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews of BBM participants, followed by theoretical deductive analysis of coded data guided by Pacific Fonofale and Māori Te Whare Tapa Whā health models. In this meeting-house metaphor, floor is family, roof is culture, house-posts represent physical, mental, spiritual and sociodemographic health and well-being, with surroundings of environment, time and context.

settingInterviews of BBM members conducted in South Auckland, New Zealand, 2020.

participants22 interviewees (50% female) aged 24-60 years of mixed Pacific and Māori ethnicities with a mixture of regular members, attendees of the programme for those morbidly obese and trainers.

resultsTwo researchers independently coded data with adjudication and kappa=0.61 between coders. Participants identified the interactive holistic nature of health and well-being. As well as physical, mental and spiritual benefits, BBM helped many reconnect with both their family and their culture.

conclusionsBBM's primary aim is weight-loss motivation. Many weight loss studies provide programmes to improve physical exercise and nutrition, but seldom address sustainability and other core factors such as mental health. Programmes are often designed by researchers or authorities. BBM is a community-embedded intervention, with no reliance external authorities for its ongoing implementation. It addresses many factors impacting participants' lives and social determinants of health as well as its core business of exercise and diet change. Our results indicate that BBM's holistic approach and responsiveness to perceived community needs may contribute to its sustained success.

Indexed as

COVID-19Obesity, MorbidFemaleHealth PromotionHolistic HealthHumansMaleMotivationQualitative ResearchGeneral endocrinologyMENTAL HEALTHPUBLIC HEALTHQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID35393331
PMCPMC8990259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.