Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35393309›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2022

Undifferentiated-predominant mixed-type early gastric cancer is more aggressive than pure undifferentiated type: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Peng Yang, Xiang-Dong Zheng, Jun-Mei Wang, Wen-Bin Geng, Xiaoyong Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peng Yang *Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.
Xiang-Dong Zheng *Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.
Jun-Mei WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.
Wen-Bin GengDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.
Xiaoyong WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China wxy20009@126.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8401-4888
Dalian Medical University · CNChangzhou No.2 People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies have shown that differentiated-predominant mixed-type early gastric cancer (EGC) is more aggressive than pure differentiated-type EGC. However, the biological behaviour of undifferentiated-predominant mixed-type (MU) EGC and pure undifferentiated-type (PU) EGC are controversial. This study was conducted to compare the biological behaviour of MU EGC and PU EGC.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies was conducted using literature published through PubMed and Embase from inception to 9 November 2021. Inclusion criteria were: (1) a direct or indirect comparison of MU and PU; (2) patients with EGC; (3) a specified outcome of lymph node metastasis (LNM), lymphovascular invasion, submucosal invasion and/or ulcer findings; and (4) the primary lesion was obtained. The literature search, data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. The meta-analysis was conducted with a random-effect model using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

resultsTwelve publications with 5644 patients were included. Patients with MU EGC had significantly higher risk of LNM (OR 2.28; 95% CI 1.72 to 3.03) and submucosal invasion (OR 2.19; 95% CI 1.90 to 2.52) compared with patients with PU EGC. No difference was found between patients with MU and PU EGC with respect to lymphovascular invasion risk (OR 1.81; 95% CI 0.84 to 3.87). After stratifying the data according to depth of tumour invasion, a significantly higher risk for LNM was associated with intramucosal MU EGC (OR 2.56; 95% CI 1.66 to 3.95) and submucosal MU EGC (OR 2.63; 95% CI 2.06 to 3.06). Submucosal MU EGC also had a significantly higher risk of lymphovascular invasion (OR 2.40; 95% CI 1.79 to 3.21) compared with submucosal PU EGC. DISCUSSION: Patients with MU EGC had an increased risk of submucosal invasion and LNM compared with patients with PU EGC . MU patients with submucosal EGC also had an increased lymphovascular invasion risk compared with PU patients. Therefore, attention should be focused on the clinical management of patients with MU EGC.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerGastrectomyHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsEndoscopyGastrointestinal tumours

Identifiers

PMID35393309
PMCPMC8990716
OpenAlexW4223475880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.