Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35393271›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2022

Development and preliminary validation of the Sjögren's Tool for Assessing Response (STAR): a consensual composite score for assessing treatment effect in primary Sjögren's syndrome.

Raphaele Seror, Gabriel Baron, Marine Camus, Divi Cornec, Elodie Perrodeau, Simon J Bowman, Michele Bombardieri, Hendrika Bootsma, Jacques-Eric Gottenberg, Benjamin Fisher and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Raphaele SerorParis-Saclay University, INSERM UMR1184: Centre for Immunology of Viral Infections and Autoimmune Diseases, Le Kremlin-Bicetre, France raphaele.seror@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5523-1856
Gabriel BaronAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôtel Dieu hospital, Paris, France.
Marine CamusParis-Saclay University, INSERM UMR1184: Centre for Immunology of Viral Infections and Autoimmune Diseases, Le Kremlin-Bicetre, France.
Divi CornecRhumatologie, CHU Brest, Brest, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9159-702X
Elodie PerrodeauAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôtel Dieu hospital, Paris, France.
Simon J BowmanRheumatology, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Michele BombardieriExperimental Medicine and Rheumatology, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Hendrika BootsmaRheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jacques-Eric GottenbergRheumatology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9469-946X
Benjamin FisherNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4631-549X
Wolfgang HueberNovartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland.
Joel A van RoonImmunology, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Center of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Valérie Devauchelle-PensecRhumatologie, CHU Brest, Brest, France.
Peter GergelyNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Xavier Mariette *Paris-Saclay University, INSERM UMR1184: Centre for Immunology of Viral Infections and Autoimmune Diseases, Le Kremlin-Bicetre, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4244-5417
Raphael Porcher *Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôtel Dieu hospital, Paris, France.
NECESSITY WP5 - STAR development working group
NECESSITY WP5- STAR development working group
Inserm · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FRNovartis (Switzerland) · CHCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRMilton Keynes Hospital · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N003063/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a composite responder index in primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS): the Sjögren's Tool for Assessing Response (STAR).

methodsTo develop STAR, the NECESSITY (New clinical endpoints in primary Sjögren's syndrome: an interventional trial based on stratifying patients) consortium used data-driven methods based on nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and consensus techniques involving 78 experts and 20 patients. Based on reanalysis of rituximab trials and the literature, the Delphi panel identified a core set of domains with their respective outcome measures. STAR options combining these domains were proposed to the panel for selection and improvement. For each STAR option, sensitivity to change was estimated by the C-index in nine RCTs. Delphi rounds were run for selecting STAR. For the options remaining before the final vote, a meta-analysis of the RCTs was performed.

resultsThe Delphi panel identified five core domains (systemic activity, patient symptoms, lachrymal gland function, salivary gland function and biological parameters), and 227 STAR options combining these domains were selected to be tested for sensitivity to change. After two Delphi rounds, a meta-analysis of the 20 remaining options was performed. The candidate STAR was then selected by a final vote based on metrological properties and clinical relevance.

conclusionThe candidate STAR is a composite responder index that includes all main disease features in a single tool and is designed for use as a primary endpoint in pSS RCTs. The rigorous and consensual development process ensures its face and content validity. The candidate STAR showed good sensitivity to change and will be prospectively validated by the NECESSITY consortium in a dedicated RCT.

Indexed as

Sjogren's SyndromeConsensusHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareRituximabRituximaboutcome assessment, health carepatient reported outcome measuresSjogren's syndrome

Identifiers

PMID35393271
PMCPMC9209686
OpenAlexW4226021965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.