ReviewJournal of the American College of Cardiology2022
Sex-Related Outcomes of Medical, Percutaneous, and Surgical Interventions for Coronary Artery Disease: JACC Focus Seminar 3/7.
Review in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in left main disease according to patients' sex: A meta-analysis.European journal of clinical investigation · 2025Pooled it
- Patient-physician sex concordance and outcomes in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review.European heart journal · 2024Pooled it
- Outcomes by sex in the International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024Trial
- Higher exercise capacity, but not omega-3 fatty acid consumption, predicts lower coronary artery calcium scores in women and men with coronary artery disease.Atherosclerosis · 2023Trial
- Rethinking risk: The prognostic power of coronary plaque in young women.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Peak filling rate assessed by myocardial perfusion imaging predicts adverse outcomes in women with chronic coronary syndromes.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Sex-specific assumptions underlie cardiovascular digital twin technologies: A narrative review.PLOS digital health · 2026Review
- Sex-Related Differences in the Prevalence and Clinical Outcomes of Moderate-to-Severe Coronary Artery Calcification in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026Observational
- Association of surgeon sex with postoperative adverse outcomes in adult cardiac surgery: a nationwide cohort study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Acute coronary syndromes across the lifespan of women.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2026Review
- Patient-Surgeon Sex Concordance and Clinical Outcomes After Adult Cardiac Surgery.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Article
- How Sex and Race/Ethnicity Influence Interventional Cardiology Outcomes: What Do We Know?Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Review
- Sex-Based Differences in Long-Term Outcomes Following Intravascular Brachytherapy for In-Stent Restenosis.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Coronary artery surgery outcome differences by sex.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Review
- The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Women's Cardiovascular Disease Care.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Statin Use Among Women and Men Following Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Barriers and solutions in women's health research and clinical care: a call to action.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2025Review
- Sex-based Differences in Complications Following Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Biological and sociocultural differences between men and women are complex and likely account for most of the variations in the epidemiology and treatment outcomes of coronary artery disease (CAD) between the 2 sexes. Worse outcomes in women have been described following both conservative and invasive treatments of CAD. For example, increased levels of residual platelet reactivity during treatment with antiplatelet drugs, higher rates of adverse cardiovascular outcomes following percutaneous coronary revascularization, and higher operative and long-term mortality after coronary bypass surgery have been reported in women compared with in men. Despite the growing recognition of sex-specific determinants of outcomes, representation of women in clinical studies remains low and sex-specific management strategies are generally not provided in guidelines. This review summarizes the current evidence on sex-related differences in patients with CAD, focusing on the differential outcomes following medical therapy, percutaneous coronary interventions, and coronary artery bypass surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.