Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35393022›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American College of Cardiology2022

Sex-Specific Considerations in the Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management of Ischemic Heart Disease: JACC Focus Seminar 2/7.

Sade Solola Nussbaum, Sonia Henry, Celina Mei Yong, Stacie L Daugherty, Roxana Mehran, Athena Poppas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Differences of plaque burden measures on CCTA in younger men and women.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sex-Related Differences in the Prevalence and Clinical Outcomes of Moderate-to-Severe Coronary Artery Calcification in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Sex-Based Differences in Long-Term Outcomes Following Intravascular Brachytherapy for In-Stent Restenosis.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Article
  11. Sex Differences in Atherosclerotic Coronary Artery Disease Patterns.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sade Solola NussbaumDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Sonia HenryDepartment of Cardiology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Norwell, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, New York, USA.
Celina Mei YongDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Stacie L DaughertyDivision of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Roxana MehranIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Athena PoppasDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. Electronic address: apoppas@lifespan.org.

Funding

Using values affirmation to reduce the effects of perceived discrimination on hypertension disparitiesR01HL133343 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI DAUGHERTY, STACIE LUTHER · 2016 to 2019
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL133343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are sex-related differences in the epidemiology, presentation, diagnostic testing, and management of ischemic heart disease in women compared with men. The adjusted morbidity and mortality are persistently higher, particularly in younger women and Blacks. Women have more angina but less obstructive coronary artery disease, which affects delays in presentation and diagnosis and testing accuracy. The nonbiological factors play a significant role in access to care, ischemic heart disease management, and guideline adherence. Future research focus includes sex-specific outcomes, characterization of the biological differences, and implementation science around quality of clinical care.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaFemaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsSex CharacteristicsSex Factorscoronary artery diseaseischemic heart diseasesex differenceswomen

Identifiers

PMID35393022
PMCPMC9009217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.