Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35392958›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

A laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass with wrapping versus nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to treat obese patients (FundoRingOAGB trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Oral Ospanov, Galymzhan Yeleuov, Alexandr Fursov, Bakhtiyar Yelembayev, Roman Fursov, Zhenis Sergazin, Adil Mustafin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04834635 (The Total Wrapping of the Fundus of the Gastric Excluded Part), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04834635 nacompletednot on this map

The Total Wrapping of the Fundus of the Gastric Excluded Part (FundoRing) Versus Non- Wrapping (Non-banded) Standard Method of Laparoscopic One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini - Gastric Bypass: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Society of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgeons of KazakhstanRan2021 to 2026Enrolled1,000ConditionsObesity, MorbidArmsFundoRingOAGB, OAGB
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Oral OspanovDepartment of Surgical Disease and Bariatric Surgery, Astana Medical University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan. bariatric.kz@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1840-114X
Galymzhan YeleuovDepartment of Surgical Disease and Bariatric Surgery, Astana Medical University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
Alexandr FursovDepartment of Surgical Disease and Bariatric Surgery, Astana Medical University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
Bakhtiyar YelembayevDepartment of Surgical Disease and Bariatric Surgery, Astana Medical University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
Roman FursovDepartment of Surgical Disease and Bariatric Surgery, Astana Medical University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
Zhenis SergazinDepartment of Surgical Disease and Bariatric Surgery, Astana Medical University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
Adil MustafinDepartment of Surgical Disease and Bariatric Surgery, Astana Medical University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
Astana Medical University · KZ

Funding

Republican Public Association "Society of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgeons of Kazakhstan" (SBMSK) #2021/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) is a simple variation of gastric bypass and has gained worldwide popularity with clinical outcomes similar to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) for weight loss and management of comorbidities. However, biliary reflux to the esophagus negates the benefits of LOAGB. In addition, weight gain after LOAGB and after LRYGB is a major problem in bariatric surgery. The aim of this article is to describe the design and protocol of a randomized controlled trial comparing the outcomes of two methods of LOAGB: experimental method with wrapping versus standard method nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to prevent weight regain and biliary reflux after LOAGB.

methodsThe study was designed as a single-center prospective, interventional, randomized controlled trial. Masking: None (open label). Allocation: randomized. Enrollment: 100 obese patients. The relevant ethics committee approved the trial protocol. The endpoints (body mass index, bile reflux in the esophagus, other reflux symptoms) will be assessed presurgery and postsurgery (12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively). DISCUSSION: With its 3-year follow-up time, this RCT will provide important data on the impact of wrapping the fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to prevent weight regain and biliary reflux after LOAGB.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04834635 . Registered on 8 April 2021.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidGastrectomyHumansObesityProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStomachTreatment OutcomeWeight GainFundoplicationFundoRingMGBFundoRingOAGBGastroesophageal reflux diseaseMinigastric bypassMorbid obesityOne anastomosis gastric bypass

Identifiers

PMID35392958
PMCPMC8991694
OpenAlexW4223564350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.