Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35392941›Full record

SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2022

What is the optimal surgical treatment for Neer type IIB (IIC) distal clavicle fractures? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Andreas Panagopoulos, Konstantina Solou, Irini Tatani, Ioannis K Triantafyllopoulos, John Lakoumentas, Antonis Kouzelis, Vasileios Athanasiou, Zinon T Kokkalis

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andreas PanagopoulosDepartment of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Patras University Hospital, Papanikolaou 1, 26504, Rio-Patras, Greece. andpan21@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8215-9327
Konstantina SolouDepartment of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Patras University Hospital, Papanikolaou 1, 26504, Rio-Patras, Greece.
Irini TataniDepartment of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Patras University Hospital, Papanikolaou 1, 26504, Rio-Patras, Greece.
Ioannis K TriantafyllopoulosHygeia Private Hospital, Athens, Greece.
John LakoumentasDepartment of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Patras University, Rio-Patras, Greece.
Antonis KouzelisDepartment of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Patras University Hospital, Papanikolaou 1, 26504, Rio-Patras, Greece.
Vasileios AthanasiouDepartment of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Patras University Hospital, Papanikolaou 1, 26504, Rio-Patras, Greece.
Zinon T KokkalisDepartment of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Patras University Hospital, Papanikolaou 1, 26504, Rio-Patras, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of the present study was to systematically review the current treatment strategies for the treatment of Neer type IIB distal clavicle fractures in terms of functional outcome and complication rates and to examine the most appropriate surgical method by comparing all the available surgical techniques and implants.

methodsWe performed a systematic review of the existing literature (2000-2021) in accordance with the PRISMA statement. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Research Gate and Google Scholar using the general terms 'distal AND clavicle AND fracture' to capture as many reports as possible. The MINORS tool was used to assess the risk of bias of the nonrandomized studies. We categorized the reported surgical techniques into four main types: open or arthroscopic coracoclavicular (CC) stabilization, locking plate fixation with or without CC augmentation, hook plate fixation and acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) transfixation. We reported findings for two main outcomes: clinical results and complication rates categorized into major and minor.

resultsOur database search yielded a total of 630 records; 34 studies were appropriate for qualitative analysis. There were 790 patients, with a mean age of 40.1 years, a female percentage of 37% and a mean follow-up period of 29.3 months. In total, 132 patients received a hook plate, 252 received a locking plate, 368 received CC stabilization and 41 received transacromial transfixation. All studies were retrospective and had fair MINORS scores. Locking plate, CC stabilization and ACJ transfixation showed similar clinical results but were much better than hook plate fixation; CC augmentation did not significantly improve the outcome of locking plate fixation. The rate of major complications was similar among groups; hook plate and AC joint transfixation had the worst rates of minor complications. Open CC techniques were slightly better than arthroscopic techniques.

conclusionsThe present systematic review for the optimal fixation method for Neer type IIB fractures of the distal clavicle showed similar major complication rates among techniques; the hook plate technique demonstrated inferior clinical results to other techniques. Open CC stabilization and locking plate fixation without CC augmentation seem to be the best available treatment options.

Indexed as

ClavicleFractures, BoneAdultBone PlatesFemaleFracture Fixation, InternalHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeACJ transfixationCoracoclavicular stabilizationDistal clavicle fracturesHook plateLocking plateNeer type IIB

Identifiers

PMID35392941
PMCPMC8991691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.