Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35392913›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2022

Understanding the sustainment of population health programmes from a whole-of-system approach.

Melanie Crane, Nicole Nathan, Heather McKay, Karen Lee, John Wiggers, Adrian Bauman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Characterisation of At-Scale Community Health Interventions Aimed to Improve Healthy Eating Behaviour in Australia: A Rapid Review.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Melanie CraneThe Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, The Sax Institute, 235 Jones Street, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia. Melanie.crane@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3058-2211
Nicole NathanHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, Australia.
Heather McKayDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, 5950 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, V6T 123, Canada.
Karen LeeThe Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, The Sax Institute, 235 Jones Street, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia.
John WiggersThe Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, The Sax Institute, 235 Jones Street, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia.
Adrian BaumanThe Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, The Sax Institute, 235 Jones Street, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUHunter Medical Research Institute · AUVancouver Coastal Health · CA

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council GNT9100001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPopulation health prevention programmes are needed to reduce the prevalence of chronic diseases. Nevertheless, sustaining programmes at a population level is challenging. Population health is highly influenced by social, economic and political environments and is vulnerable to these system-level changes. The aim of this research was to examine the factors and mechanisms contributing to the sustainment of population prevention programmes taking a systems thinking approach.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study through interviews with population health experts working within Australian government and non-government agencies experienced in sustaining public health programs at the local, state or national level (n = 13). We used a deductive thematic approach, grounded in systems thinking to analyse data.

resultsWe identified four key barriers affecting program sustainment: 1) short term political and funding cycles; 2) competing interests; 3) silo thinking within health service delivery; and 4) the fit of a program to population needs. To overcome these barriers various approaches have centred on the importance of long-range planning and resourcing, flexible program design and management, leadership and partnerships, evidence generation, and system support structures.

conclusionThis study provides key insights for overcoming challenges to the sustainment of population health programmes amidst complex system-wide changes.

Indexed as

LeadershipPopulation HealthAustraliaHumansPublic HealthQualitative ResearchHealth promotionImplementationInterventionNoncommunicable diseasesPopulation healthSustainabilitySystems thinking

Identifiers

PMID35392913
PMCPMC8988542
OpenAlexW4223443722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.