Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35392894›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2022

Describing workplace interventions aimed to improve health of staff in hospital settings - a systematic review.

Verity Worley, Penny Fraser, Steven Allender, Kristy A Bolton

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Comparative Policy Analysis of Healthcare Healthy Eating Policies in Canada.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Physical Activity Patterns and Lifestyle Habits Among Primary Healthcare Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Verity WorleyGlobal Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Penny FraserGlobal Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Steven AllenderGlobal Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Kristy A BoltonGlobal Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. kristy.bolton@deakin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6721-4503

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1114118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA large proportion of staff working in hospital settings are overweight or obese, have poor dietary habits and low physical activity levels. The workplace is a priority setting for health promotion. This systematic review will describe dietary and physical activity workplace interventions that have aimed to improve the health of staff in hospital settings; and the barriers and enablers of implementing these interventions.

methodsA systematic search retrieved 551 studies from 2004 to 2020 using the following databases CINAHL Complete, MEDLINE Complete, Academic Search Complete, Global Health, Health Source Nursing/Academic Edition and PsycINFO. Studies were included if they: (1) took place in a hospital setting; (2) employed a physical activity or dietary intervention to improve the well-being of staff; (3) the intervention duration was 12 weeks or over; (4) used a control group. The Integrated quality Criteria for the Review of Multiple Study designs (ICROMS) and National Institute of Health's National Heart Lung and Blood Institute Quality Assessment Tools for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies tools were used to assess quality of included studies. A narrative review was conducted.

resultsQuality analysis identified six studies of high quality, nine moderate quality, and three low quality. Of these 18 studies, 15 reported at least one positive health outcome. The evidence revealed that multi-component strategies, financial incentives and motivational strategies were the most effective approaches to improve health behaviours of hospital staff.

conclusionHospital-based dietary and physical activity workplace interventions show promise as an effective strategy for improving health behaviours of hospital staff. Methodological limitations highlight the need for more research from high-quality, randomised control trials, to gain further insight into the benefits of workplace interventions in hospital settings.

Indexed as

ExerciseWorkplaceCross-Sectional StudiesHealth PromotionHospitalsHumansHealth behavioursHospitalStaffSystematic reviewWorkplace intervention

Identifiers

PMID35392894
PMCPMC8991835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.