Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35392857›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Epidemiological analysis of varicella in Dalian from 2009 to 2019 and application of three kinds of model in prediction prevalence of varicella.

Tingting Cheng, Yu Bai, Xianzhi Sun, Yuchen Ji, Fan Zhang, Xiaofeng Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tingting Cheng *Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Dalian Medical University, 9 Lvshun South Road, Dalian, 116044, People's Republic of China.
Yu Bai *Dalian Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 78 Taiyuan Street, Dalian, 116021, People's Republic of China.
Xianzhi SunDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Dalian Medical University, 9 Lvshun South Road, Dalian, 116044, People's Republic of China.
Yuchen JiDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Dalian Medical University, 9 Lvshun South Road, Dalian, 116044, People's Republic of China.
Fan ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Dalian Medical University, 9 Lvshun South Road, Dalian, 116044, People's Republic of China.
Xiaofeng LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Dalian Medical University, 9 Lvshun South Road, Dalian, 116044, People's Republic of China. lxf_chen@dmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study described the epidemic characteristics of varicella in Dalian from 2009 to 2019, explored the fitting effect of Grey model first-order one variable( GM(1,1)), Markov model, and GM(1,1)-Markov model on varicella data, and found the best fitting method for this type of data, to better predict the incidence trend.

methodsFor this Cross-sectional study, this article was completed in 2020, and the data collection is up to 2019. Due to the global epidemic, the infectious disease data of Dalian in 2020 itself does not conform to the normal changes of varicella and is not included. The epidemiological characteristics of varicella from 2009 to 2019 were analyzed by epidemiological descriptive methods. Using the varicella prevalence data from 2009 to 2018, predicted 2019 and compared with actual value. First made GM (1,1) prediction and Markov prediction. Then according to the relative error of the GM (1,1), made GM (1,1)-Markov prediction.

resultsThis study collected 37,223 cases from China Information System for Disease Control and Prevention's "Disease Prevention and Control Information System" and the cumulative population was 73,618,235 from 2009 to 2019. The average annual prevalence was 50.56/100000. Varicella occurred all year round, it had a bimodal distribution. The number of cases had two peaks from April to June and November to January of the following year. The ratio of males to females was 1.17:1. The 4 to 25 accounted for 60.36% of the total population. The age of varicella appeared to shift backward. Students, kindergarten children, scattered children accounted for about 64% of all cases. The GM(1,1) model prediction result of 2019 would be 53.64, the relative error would be 14.42%, the Markov prediction result would be 56.21, the relative error would be 10.33%, and the Gray(1,1)-Markov prediction result would be 59.51. The relative error would be 5.06%.

conclusionsVaricella data had its unique development characteristics. The accuracy of GM (1,1)-Markov model is higher than GM(1.1) model and Markov model. The model can be used for prediction and decision guidance.

Indexed as

ChickenpoxChildChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMalePrevalenceEpidemic characteristicsGM (1,1) modelMarkov model GM (1,1)-Markov modelVaricella

Identifiers

PMID35392857
PMCPMC8991558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.