Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35392841›Full record

Trial reportBMC ophthalmology2022

Effect of 0.02% and 0.01% atropine on astigmatism: a two-year clinical trial.

Ming Wang, Can Cui, Yao Sui, Shi-Ao Yu, Jing-Xue Ma, Ai-Cun Fu

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Effect of Three Types of Specially-Designed Myopia Control Spectacle Lenses on Astigmatism: A Two-Year Result.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  4. The role of astigmatism in myopia development, myopia progression and myopia control.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. IMI 2023 Digest.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ming WangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jianshe road, Zhengzhou, 450000, China.
Can CuiThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450000, China.
Yao SuiThe Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Heping West Road No. 215, Shi Jiazhuang, 050000, China.
Shi-Ao YuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jianshe road, Zhengzhou, 450000, China.
Jing-Xue MaThe Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Heping West Road No. 215, Shi Jiazhuang, 050000, China. majingxue2003@163.com.
Ai-Cun FuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jianshe road, Zhengzhou, 450000, China. fuaicun2019@qq.com.
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNHebei Medical University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNSecond Hospital of Hebei Medical University · CN

Funding

Health and Family Planning Science and Technology Talents Overseas Training Project of Henan Province 2018038Key Scientific Research Project of Universities of Henan Education Department 19A320066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the effects of 0.02% and 0.01% atropine eye drops on ocular and corneal astigmatism over 2 years.

methodsA prospective clinic-controlled trail. The cohort study assessed 400 myopic children and divided them into three groups: 138 and 142 children were randomized to use either 0.02% or 0.01% atropine eye drops, respectively. They wore single-vision (SV) spectacles, with one drop of atropine applied to both eyes once nightly. Control children (n = 120) only wore SV spectacles. Spherical equivalent refractive errors (SER) and corneal curvature were measured every 4 months. The SER and corneal curvature were assessed by cycloplegic autorefraction and IOLMaster. Ocular and corneal astigmatism were calculated by Thibos vector analysis and then split into its power vector components, J0 (with-the-rule astigmatism) and J45 (oblique).

resultsAfter 2 years, the ocular astigmatism increased by -0.38 ± 0.29 D, -0.47 ± 0.38 D, -0.41 ± 0.35 D in the 0.02%, 0.01% atropine groups and control group, respectively (p = 0.15). The corresponding corneal astigmatism increased by -0.20 ± 0.34 D, -0.28 ± 0.35 D and -0.26 ± 0.26 D (p = 0.18). The ocular astigmatism J0 increased by 0.19 ± 0.28 D, 0.22 ± 0.36 D, 0.18 ± 0.31 D in the 0.02% atropine, 0.01% atropine and control groups, respectively (p = 0.65). The corresponding corneal astigmatism J0 increased by -0.05 ± 0.34 D, -0.11 ± 0.37 D and -0.13 ± 0.30 D (p = 0.23). There was a small but significant increase in ocular astigmatism (including J0) (all P < 0.05), but there were no changes in the ocular astigmatism J45 and corneal astigmatism (including J0 and J45) in the three groups over time (all p > 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the changes in ocular astigmatism (including J0) among the three groups.

conclusionsTreatment with 0.02% and 0.01% atropine had no clinically significant effect on ocular and corneal astigmatism over 2 years.

trial registrationThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, ChiCTR-IPD-16008844 . Registered 14/07/2016.

Indexed as

AstigmatismCorneal DiseasesAtropineChildCohort StudiesCorneaHumansOphthalmic SolutionsProspective StudiesRefraction, OcularAtropineOphthalmic SolutionsAstigmatismAtropineChildrenLow-concentrationMyopia

Identifiers

PMID35392841
PMCPMC8991778
OpenAlexW4223492763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.