Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35392826›Full record

ReviewBMC emergency medicine2022

Pathways to the emergency department - a national, cross-sectional study in Sweden.

Joakim Henricson, Ulf Ekelund, Jens Hartman, Bruno Ziegler, Lisa Kurland, Daniel Björk Wilhelms

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Patients' pathways to the emergency department: a scoping review.International journal of emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Disposition of emergency department patients with acute pulmonary embolism after ambulance arrival.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2023
    Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joakim HenricsonDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. joakim.henricson@regionostergotland.se.
Ulf EkelundDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Jens HartmanDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Bruno ZieglerDepartment of Emergency Medicine Örebro University Hospital, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Lisa Kurland *Department of Emergency Medicine Örebro University Hospital, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Daniel Björk Wilhelms *Department of Emergency Medicine, Local Health Care Services in Central Östergötland, Region Östergötland, SE-58185, Linköping, Sweden.
Linköping University · SEÖrebro University Hospital · SECounty Administrative Board · SELund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSwedish Emergency Departments (EDs) see 2.6 million visits annually. Sweden has a strong tradition of health care databases, but information on patients' pathways to the ED is not documented in any registry. The aim of this study was to provide a national overview of pathways, degree of medical acuteness according to triage, chief complaints, and hospital admission rates for adult patients (≥18 years) visiting Swedish EDs during 24 h.

methodsA national cross-sectional study including all patients at 43 of Sweden's 72 EDs during 24 h on April 25th, 2018. Pathway to the ED, medical acuteness at triage, admission and basic demographics were registered by dedicated assessors present at every ED for the duration of the study. Descriptive data are reported.

resultsA total of 3875 adult patients (median age 59; range 18 to 107; 50% men) were included in the study. Complete data for pathway to the ED was reported for 3693 patients (98%). The most common pathway was self-referred walk-in (n = 1310; 34%), followed by ambulance (n = 920; 24%), referral from a general practitioner (n = 497; 1 3%), and telephone referral by the national medical helpline "1177" (n = 409; 10%). In patients 18 to 64 years, self-referred walk-in was most common, whereas transport by ambulance dominated in patients > 64 years. Of the 3365 patients who received a medical acuteness level at triage, 4% were classified as Red (Immediate), 18% as Orange (very urgent), 47% as Yellow (Urgent), 26% as Green (Standard), and 5% as Blue (Non-Urgent). Abdominal or chest pain were the most common chief complaints representing approximately 1/3 of all presentations. Overall, the admission rate was 27%. Arrival by ambulance was associated with the highest rate of admission (53%), whereas walk-in patients and telephone referrals were less often admitted.

conclusionSelf-referred walk-in was the overall most common pathway followed by ambulance. Patients arriving by ambulance were often elderly, critically ill and often admitted to in-patient care, whereas arrival by self-referred walk-in was more common in younger patients.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalTriageAdultAgedAmbulancesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSwedenAfter hours careDelivery of health careDemographyEmergency serviceHospitalSwedenTriage

Identifiers

PMID35392826
PMCPMC8991881
OpenAlexW4223572576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.