ArticleHand (New York, N.Y.)2023
Reoperation After Operative Treatment of Open Finger Fractures.
Article in Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phalangeal fractures: A retrospective comparison of open reduction and internal fixation vs. closed reduction and percutaneous pinning.Journal of hand and microsurgery · 2024Article
- Phalangeal Fractures Requiring Vascular Reconstruction: Epidemiology and Factors Predictive of Reoperation.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOur primary aim was to develop a prediction model for return to the operating room (OR) after open finger fractures by studying the reoperation rate of open finger fractures based on patient demographics, injury mechanism, injury severity, and type of initial surgical fixation. The secondary aim was to study the predictors for secondary surgery due to nonunion, postoperative infection, and secondary amputation.
methodsIn the retrospective chart review, 1321 open finger fractures of 907 patients were included. Demographic-, injury-, and treatment-related factors were gathered from medical records.
resultsWe found that open fractures involving the thumb had lower odds of undergoing secondary surgery. Crush injury, proximal phalangeal fracture, arterial injury, other injured fingers, and other injuries to the ipsilateral hand were associated with higher odds of undergoing secondary surgery. However, the associated factors we identified were not powerful enough to create a predictive model. Other injury to the ipsilateral hand, vein repair, and external fixator as initial treatment were associated with postoperative nonunion. Crush injury and proximal phalangeal fracture were associated with postoperative infection. No factors were associated with secondary amputation.
conclusionsA quarter of open finger fractures will likely need more than one surgical procedure, especially in more severely injured fingers, due to crush or with vascular impairment. Furthermore, fractures involving the thumb have less reoperation, while fractures involving the proximal phalanx have poorest outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.