ArticleThe American surgeon2022
Unmasking the Confounder: The Inherent Physiologic Variability of Swine During an Automated Experimental Model of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.
Article in The American surgeon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elamipretide mitigates ischemia-reperfusion injury in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Investigating the variability in pressure-volume relationships during hemorrhage and aortic occlusion.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe sought to determine the magnitude of the inherent inter-animal physiologic variability by automating a porcine Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) protocol to minimize external influences that might alter physiology and confound experimental results.
methodsSwine (n = 42) underwent a controlled 30% blood volume hemorrhage followed by 30 minutes of REBOA (ie, ischemic phase). The animals were weaned from REBOA autonomously over 15 minutes, beginning the reperfusion phase, while continuing to provide partial flow balloon support to maintain a target proximal mean arterial pressure (pMAP) of 65 mmHg. Simultaneously, shed blood was re-transfused as part of the resuscitation efforts. Physiologic data were continuously recorded, and serum samples were serially collected. Baseline characteristics, variance in vital signs, and 8-isoprostane levels were quantified during hemorrhage, REBOA, and reperfusion phases.
resultsThere was no significant difference in baseline physiology across animals ( DISCUSSION: Despite subjecting animals to a highly consistent ischemia-reperfusion injury through automation, we noted significant variability in the hemodynamic and biochemical response. These findings illustrate the inherent physiologic variability and potential limitations of porcine large animal models for the study of shock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.