Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35392645›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022

Biological Deciphering of the "Kidney Governing Bones" Theory in Traditional Chinese Medicine.

Hanmin Zhu, Qi Liu, Wei Li, Shuming Huang, Bo Zhang, Yumei Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hanmin Zhu *Hubei University of Arts and Science, HuBei, XiangYang 441053, China.
Qi Liu *Qiqihar Medical University, Heilongjiang, Qiqihar 161006, China.
Wei LiHubei University of Arts and Science, HuBei, XiangYang 441053, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7714-1184
Shuming HuangHeilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Heilongjiang, Harbin 150040, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2161-9801
Bo ZhangHeilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Heilongjiang, Harbin 150040, China.
Yumei WangQiqihar Medical University, Heilongjiang, Qiqihar 161006, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8233-1556

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The description of the "kidney" was entirely different from modern medicine. In traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), the kidney was a functional concept regulating water metabolism, which was closely related to the urinary system, reproductive system, nervous system, endocrine, skeleton, hearing, metabolism, immunity, etc. In particular, the kidney in TCM plays an important regulatory role in the processes of growth, development, prime, aging, and reproduction. Hence, "Kidney Governing Bone" (KGB) was a classical theory in TCM, which hypothesized that the function of the kidney was responsible for bone health. However, the related modern physiological mechanisms of this TCM theory are unclear. This present paper proposed a new understanding and explored the biological basis of the KGB theory. After searching through plenty of reported literature, we discovered that the functions of the kidney in TCM were closely associated with the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis in modern science. The physiological mechanism of the KGB was regulated by sex hormones and their receptors. This review deciphered the connotation of the KGB theory in modern medicine and further verified the scientificity of the basic TCM theory.

Identifiers

PMID35392645
PMCPMC8983196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.