ReviewSurgery open science2022
Clinicopathological features of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm derived from ectopic pancreas: A systematic review.
Review in Surgery open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinicopathological characteristics of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm derived from the ectopic pancreas have not been elucidated owing to its rarity. Methods: MEDLINE databases from 1985 to 2021 were searched. Data regarding patient characteristics, diagnostic modalities, treatment, and prognosis were extracted from the identified articles. Results: Comprehensive data on 13 patients (10 men and 3 women) with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm derived from ectopic pancreas were extracted. The median age was 69 years (range, 42-80 years). The tumors were located in the stomach in 6 patients, the duodenum in 1 patient, jejunum in 3 patients, ileum in 1 patient, and Meckel diverticulum in 2 patients. Histopathological examination revealed intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm in 10 patients and intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma in 3 patients. The median size of the tumor was not significantly different between the intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma group and the intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm group (P = .611). Conclusion: Accurate preoperative diagnosis and differential diagnosis between intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma remain difficult despite recent advances in imaging modalities.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.