Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35392533›Full record

ArticleNutrition research and practice2022

Development of the Korean Healthy Eating Index for adults, based on the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Sungha Yun, Sohee Park, Sung-Min Yook, Kirang Kim, Jae Eun Shim, Ji-Yun Hwang, Kyungwon Oh

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sungha YunDivision of Health and Nutrition Survey and Analysis, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju 28160, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3624-4512
Sohee ParkDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8513-5163
Sung-Min YookDepartment of Foodservice Management and Nutrition, Sangmyung University, Seoul 03016, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8359-550X
Kirang KimDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3054-8758
Jae Eun ShimDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Daejeon University, Daejeon 34520, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8458-9112
Ji-Yun HwangDepartment of Foodservice Management and Nutrition, Sangmyung University, Seoul 03016, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4003-1293
Kyungwon OhDivision of Health and Nutrition Survey and Analysis, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju 28160, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8097-6078
Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency · KRSangmyung University · KRDaejeon University · KRDankook University · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesThe objective of this study was to describe the development process of the Korean Healthy Eating Index (KHEI) based on the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). SUBJECTS/

methodsThe components of KHEI were selected based on Dietary Guidelines for Koreans, domestic and overseas dietary quality indices, and results of the analysis of association with chronic diseases. The standards for scoring of KHEI were selected based on the 2015 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans (KDRI). The KHEI scores of Korean adults were calculated using a 1-day 24-h recall data in the 2013-2015 KNHANES.

resultsThe KHEI included eight adequacy components evaluating the proper intake of recommended foods such as fruit, vegetable, and milk and three moderation components evaluating the consumption of food that limit intake such as sodium and saturated fatty acid. In addition, three balance components assessing the balance of energy intake were included. The KHEI score was defined to range from the minimum of 0 point to the maximum of 100 points. Among Korean adults, the total KHEI score was 63.2 out of 100. Gender and age differences were found in the average of total KHEI scores. Women showed higher score than men (61.7 in men and 64.7 in women, respectively). By age group, 20s and 30s showed the lowest scores with 57.4 and 61.1 respectively, and the scores increased with age by peaking at 67.8 in ages 60-69 and slowed down again in ages 70 or over.

conclusionsThe KHEI can be useful for establishing and assessing national nutritional policies and in epidemiological studies to assess the relationship between overall dietary quality and chronic diseases. KHEI will need to be continuously updated to reflect changes in dietary guidelines and the KDRI.

Indexed as

health eatinghealthy dietHealthy eating indexKorea

Identifiers

PMID35392533
PMCPMC8971822
OpenAlexW3198963196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.