Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35392525›Full record

ArticleNutrition research and practice2022

Workplace foodservice meals are associated with higher nutritional quality among adult Korean workers: a nationwide cross-sectional study.

Woo-Young Shin, Soo Hyun Cho, Jung-Ha Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Woo-Young ShinDepartment of Family Medicine, Chung-Ang University Medical Center, Seoul 06973, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9495-7182
Soo Hyun ChoDepartment of Family Medicine, Chung-Ang University Medical Center, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul 06973, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0054-2366
Jung-Ha KimDepartment of Family Medicine, Chung-Ang University Medical Center, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul 06973, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7630-9501

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesAdequate nutritional intake is essential for good health and well-being. We aimed to compare the nutrient intake from homemade meals, meals sourced externally ("eating out"), and meals from workplace foodservices, as well as the potential association between foodservices used and nutritional quality among adult Korean workers. SUBJECTS/

methodsWe used data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a nationwide cross-sectional survey on the health and nutritional status of the Korean population. Data from 6,845 workers aged 20-64 years were included. A survey on dietary behavior and nutrition was conducted using the 24-h dietary recall method. Nutritional quality was examined using the index of nutritional quality (INQ) score. Higher INQ scores reflected poorer nutritional quality, with insufficient intake of a higher number of nutrients. Multivariate linear regression was used to identify the association between the foodservices used and INQ scores after adjusting for other covariates.

resultsWe found that foodservice users exhibited a higher 1-day intake of total energy and macronutrients (all

conclusionsThe use of workplace foodservices contributed to higher dietary nutritional quality among workers. This study highlights the importance of expanding the scope of workplace foodservices to promote higher nutritional quality and healthy dietary habits among workers.

Indexed as

cross-sectional studiesfood servicesNutritional qualityworkers

Identifiers

PMID35392525
PMCPMC8971818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.