Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35392491›Full record

ArticleAEM education and training2022

Characterizing the biomechanical differences between novice and expert point-of-care ultrasound practitioners using a low-cost gyroscope and accelerometer integrated sensor: A pilot study.

Ross Prager, Paul Pageau, Timothy Hodges, Christina Yan, Michael Woo, Marie-Joe Nemnom, Scott Millington, Matthew Holden, Raphael St-Gelais, Warren J Cheung

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AEM education and training, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ross PragerDepartment of Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8145-8141
Paul PageauDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Timothy HodgesFaculty of Engineering University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Christina YanFaculty of Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Michael WooDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Marie-Joe NemnomClinical Epidemiology Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Scott MillingtonDivision of Critical Care University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Matthew HoldenSchool of Computer Science Carleton University Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Raphael St-GelaisFaculty of Engineering University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Warren J CheungDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2730-8190
University of Ottawa · CACarleton University · CAOttawa Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become an important diagnostic tool in acute care medicine; however, little is known about the biomechanical differences between novice and expert practitioners. Methods: A low-cost ($50 CAD) gyroscope and accelerometer integrated sensor was assembled and affixed to an ultrasound probe. Seventeen participants, nine novices and eight experts, were recruited to perform three abdominal and four cardiac scans on a standardized patient. Participant demographics, time per scan, average acceleration, average angular velocity, decay in acceleration and angular velocity over time, and frequency of probe movements were analyzed. Video capture with blinded video review was scored. Results: On video review, experts had higher image optimization and acquisition scores for both abdominal and cardiac scans. Experts had shorter scan times for abdominal (7 s vs. 26 s, Discussion: This study supports the feasibility of a low-cost gyroscope and accelerometer integrated sensor to quantify the biomechanics of POCUS. It may also support the concept of "window shopping" as a method by which experts obtain abdominal and cardiac views, where sliding is used to find an acoustic window, then smaller rocking and tilting probe movements are used to refine the image.

Identifiers

PMID35392491
PMCPMC8963729
OpenAlexW4213128887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.