ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2022
Kimyrsa, An Oritavancin-Containing Product: Clinical Study and Review of Properties.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extrapolation of oritavancin PK/PD targets to inform therapeutic drug monitoring: a systematic review.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Oritavancin as consolidation or suppressive therapy in infective endocarditis and device-related infections: real-world experience with therapeutic drug monitoring.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Article
- Oritavancin Multiple Dosing for Complex Infections: A Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Simulation Study.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Oritavancin safety: a real-world pharmacovigilance study of the FAERS database.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Evaluating oritavancin for Gram-positive infections: a systematic review of on-label and off-label use.Drugs in context · 2026Article
- Oritavancin a Therapeutic Option for Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Selected Cases: A Comprehensive Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Comparative Effectiveness of Long-Acting Lipoglycopeptides vs Standard-of-Care Antibiotics in Serious Bacterial Infections.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- The future approach for the management of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2025Review
- Combatting Antibiotic Resistance: Regulatory Exclusivities for New Antibiotic Development in the United States and Europe.Infectious diseases & immunity · 2024Review
- Oritavancin vs Standard of Care for Treatment of Nonendovascular Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infections.Open forum infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Role of Oritavancin in the Treatment of Infective Endocarditis, Catheter- or Device-Related Infections, Bloodstream Infections, and Bone and Prosthetic Joint Infections in Humans: Narrative Review and Possible Developments.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Kimyrsa and Orbactiv - A Tale of Two Formulations.Drug design, development and therapy · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is a need for improved antibiotic formulations for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and soft structure infection (ABSSSI), especially with the rise of antimicrobial resistance among Gram-positive bacteria. A new formulation of oritavancin was developed to reduce intravenous infusion volume (from 1000 mL to 250 mL), shorten infusion time (from 3 hours to 1 hour), and provide pharmacies with flexibility in oritavancin preparation (from 5% dextrose in sterile water to either normal saline or 5% dextrose in sterile water) compared with the current formulation. Methods: A total of 102 adult patients with a diagnosis of ABSSSI suspected or confirmed to be caused by a Gram-positive pathogen were randomized 1:1 to receive either the new formulation of oritavancin or the current formulation. After a single 1200-mg intravenous infusion of oritavancin, the relative area-under-the-curve exposure of the new formulation and current formulation groups were compared. Safety and tolerability of the new formulation were assessed for treatment-emergent adverse events, serious adverse events, and changes to laboratory parameters. Results: The area under the curve for 0 hour to 72 hours postdose was very similar in the new formulation group compared with the current formulation group. No differences in treatment-emergent adverse events were observed between the current and new formulation groups, and all treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of the current formulation. Conclusions: The new formulation of oritavancin with reduced volume and duration of intravenous infusion demonstrates a safety profile and pharmacokinetics similar to that of the original formulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.