Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35392439›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2022

Defining Physiological Decompensation: An Expert Consensus and Retrospective Outcome Validation.

Oscar J L Mitchell, Maya Dewan, Heather A Wolfe, Karsten J Roberts, Stacie Neefe, Geoffrey Lighthall, Nathaniel A Sands, Gary Weissman, Jennifer Ginestra, Michael G S Shashaty and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Intensive care unit admission criteria: a scoping review.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Oscar J L MitchellDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical care, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Maya DewanDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Heather A WolfeLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Karsten J RobertsDepartment of Respiratory Care, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Stacie NeefeDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical care, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Geoffrey LighthallDepartment of Anesthesia, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Nathaniel A SandsCenter for Resuscitation Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Gary WeissmanDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical care, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Jennifer GinestraDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical care, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Michael G S ShashatyDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical care, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
William D SchweickertDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical care, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Benjamin S AbellaCenter for Resuscitation Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
University of Pennsylvania · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Cardiology & pulmonary research training grantT32HL007891 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Jason D Christie · 1998 to 2026
$12.0M
Training in Critical Care Health Policy ResearchT32HL098054 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Scott D Halpern · 2010 to 2026
$8.2M
Improving Outcomes after Pediatric Cardiac ArrestR01HL131544 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI SUTTON, ROBERT MICHAEL · 2016 to 2020
$3.9M
AHRQ Mentored Clinical Scientist Research Career Development Award (K08): Maya DewanK08HS026975 · AHRQ · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI DEWAN, MAYA L · 2020 to 2024
$752k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS026975NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL131544NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007891NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL098054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPhysiological decompensation of hospitalized patients is common and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Research surrounding patient decompensation has been hampered by the absence of a robust definition of decompensation and lack of standardized clinical criteria with which to identify patients who have decompensated. We aimed to: 1) develop a consensus definition of physiological decompensation and 2) to develop clinical criteria to identify patients who have decompensated.

designWe utilized a three-phase, modified electronic Delphi (eDelphi) process, followed by a discussion round to generate consensus on the definition of physiological decompensation and on criteria to identify decompensation. We then validated the criteria using a retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania.

settingQuaternary academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adult patients admitted to the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania who had triggered a rapid response team (RRT) response between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsSixty-nine experts participated in the eDelphi. Participation was high across the three survey rounds (first round: 93%, second round: 94%, and third round: 98%). The expert panel arrived at a consensus definition of physiological decompensation, "An acute worsening of a patient's clinical status that poses a substantial increase to an individual's short-term risk of death or serious harm." Consensus was also reached on criteria for physiological decompensation. Invasive mechanical ventilation, severe hypoxemia, and use of vasopressor or inotrope medication were bundled as criteria for our novel decompensation metric: the adult inpatient decompensation event (AIDE). Patients who met greater than one AIDE criteria within 24 hours of an RRT call had increased adjusted odds of 7-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.1 [95% CI, 2.5-6.7]) and intensive care unit transfer (aOR, 20.6 [95% CI, 14.2-30.0]).

conclusionsThrough the eDelphi process, we have reached a consensus definition of physiological decompensation and proposed clinical criteria with which to identify patients who have decompensated using data easily available from the electronic medical record, the AIDE criteria.

Indexed as

cardiac arrestDelphi studymechanical ventilationoutcomes assessmentquality improvementrapid response team

Identifiers

PMID35392439
PMCPMC8984412
OpenAlexW4220668399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.