Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35392428›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022

Branch Retinal Artery Occlusions, Paracentral Acute Middle Maculopathy and Acute Macular Neuroretinopathy After COVID-19 Vaccinations.

Koki Ishibashi, Hiroyuki Yatsuka, Masatoshi Haruta, Kenichi Kimoto, Shigeo Yoshida, Toshiaki Kubota

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Acute macular neuroretinopathy: is the name still appropriate?Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. [A blind spot while reading].Die Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Retinal Changes After COVID-19 Infection and COVID-19 Vaccination.International medical case reports journal · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Retinal artery/vein occlusion complicating SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Koki IshibashiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Hiroyuki YatsukaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu, Japan.
Masatoshi HarutaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3151-582X
Kenichi KimotoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu, Japan.
Shigeo YoshidaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Toshiaki KubotaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu, Japan.
Kurume University · JPOita University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Potential retinal adverse events after COVID-19 vaccinations reported previously include paracentral acute middle maculopathy (PAMM), acute macular neuroretinopathy (AMN), and central serous chorioretinopathy. We report four cases of branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO), one case of PAMM, and one case of AMN that occurred after administration of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of six patients who presented to Yame General Hospital or Oita University Hospital from July through October 2021. Results: Four patients (2 males) presented with visual field defects associated with BRAO, one male patient with PAMM, and one female patient with AMN after receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. The mean age was 59.3 years; the mean best-corrected visual acuity was 20/21. The mean time from the last vaccination to the onset of visual field defect was 22.8 days. Five patients had received two doses of the vaccine and one patient one dose. Patients' medical history included diabetes mellitus in case 2, hypertension in cases 2, 3 and 6, and Alport syndrome and end-stage renal disease in case 6 for which the patient was undergoing regular hemodialysis. Conclusion: Although rare, retinal adverse events may occur after COVID-19 vaccinations. Further studies with a larger sample size should determine whether these retinal abnormalities are causally associated with COVID-19 vaccinations or just coincidental. Potential risks of BRAO/PAMM/AMN after COVID-19 vaccinations must be carefully weighed against the substantial benefit of COVID-19 vaccinations.

Indexed as

acute macular neuroretinopathybranch retinal artery occlusionparacentral acute middle maculopathyPfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccineretinal adverse events

Identifiers

PMID35392428
PMCPMC8980294
OpenAlexW4221010952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.