Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35392341›Full record

ArticleEthiopian journal of health sciences2021

Antibiotic Resistance Profile of Common Bacteria Isolated from Blood Stream, Lower Respiratory Tract and Urinary Infections in Intensive Care Unit in Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Study.

Ahmed M Kabrah, Saeed M Kabrah, Fayez S Bahwerth, Naof F Alredaini

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ethiopian journal of health sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Detection of Toxin Genes and Biofilm Formation ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ahmed M KabrahLaboratory Medicine Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Saeed M KabrahLaboratory Medicine Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Fayez S BahwerthMolecular Genetics, King Faisal Hospital, Ministry of Health, Makkah - Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Naof F AlredainiFaculty Member, King Abdulaziz University in Rabigh, Rabigh - Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Umm al-Qura University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The rate of infections in the intensive care units (ICUs) is rising, mainly because of the increasing use of invasive procedures and specialized devices. This study aimed to identify the antibiotic resistance profile of common bacteria isolated from lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs), bloodstream infections (BSIs), and urinary infections (UTIs) in ICUs in Saudi Arabia. Methods: In the current retrospective study, the isolates and antibiotic resistance were collected from the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for respiratory, blood, and urine samples. The study sample compromised 96 patients admitted to the ICU at least for 48 hours and have a central venous catheter (CVC) between November 1, 2020, and January 31, 2021. Results: 66 (68.8%) of the study sample were males, and 30 (31.2%) were females. LRTIs were the most common isolates (51 samples), followed by BSIs (28 samples) and UTIs (17 samples). The isolated pathogens in this study were Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) (59.4%), Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (11.5%), Escherichia coli (E. coli) (8.4%), Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) (7.3%), and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) (6.2%). BSI were frequently caused by CoNS (35.7%) and K. pneumoniae (35.7%), while Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) represented 10.7% of BSI. Vancomycin, Synercid, and Teicoplanin were the commonly used antibiotics and showed 100% sensitivity among S. aureus, including MRSA, while almost 100% resistance was observed for penicillin and oxacillin against the same organisms. The maximum resistance was observed with aztreonam (96.4%), ampicillin (87.3%), followed by co-amoxiclav (83.9%), cotrimoxazole (79.5%) and cephalosporin group antibiotics. Conclusions: Strict adherence to infection prevention practices and wise use of antibiotics are recommended to slow the spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR).

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcal InfectionsUrinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRetrospective StudiesSaudi ArabiaStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ResistanceCentral venous catheterIntensive care unitIsolated microorganismsSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID35392341
PMCPMC8968372
OpenAlexW4286882619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.