Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35392295›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2022

Gut Microbiota Modulate Rabbit Meat Quality in Response to Dietary Fiber.

Boshuai Liu, Yalei Cui, Qasim Ali, Xiaoyan Zhu, Defeng Li, Sen Ma, Zhichang Wang, Chengzhang Wang, Yinghua Shi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effects of α-terpineol and 1,8-cineole fromFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Changes in Muscle Quality and Gut Microbiota of Whiteleg Shrimp (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Boshuai LiuThe College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yalei CuiThe College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Qasim AliThe College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiaoyan ZhuThe College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Defeng LiThe College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Sen MaThe College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhichang WangThe College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Chengzhang WangThe College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yinghua ShiThe College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Henan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotics are widely used in gastrointestinal diseases in meat rabbit breeding, which causes safety problems for meat products. Dietary fiber can regulate the gut microbiota of meat rabbits, but the mechanism of improving meat quality is largely unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of adding different fiber sources to rabbit diets on the growth performance, gut microbiota composition, and muscle metabolite composition of meat rabbits. A total of 18 New Zealand white rabbits of similar weight (40 ± 1 day old) were randomly assigned to beet pulp treatment (BP), alfalfa meal treatment (AM), and peanut vine treatment (PV). There were 6 repeats in each treatment and all were raised in a single cage. The predictive period was 7 days and the experimental period was 40 days. The results revealed that AM and PV supplementation increased growth performance, slaughter performance, and intestinal development of meat rabbits compared with the BP treatment, and especially the effect of AM treatment was better. The content of butyric acid was increased in PV and AM treatments compared with the BP treatment. The expression of mitochondrial biosynthesis genes of liver, cecum, and muscle showed that AM treatment increased gene expression of CPT1b compared to the BP treatment. In addition, AM and PV treatments significantly increased the microbial diversity and richness compared with BP treatment, and their bacterial community composition was similar, and there were some differences between AM and PV treatments and BP treatment. Metabonomics analysis of muscle showed that AM treatment significantly increased amino acid and fatty acid metabolites compared with BP treatment, which were mainly concentrated in energy metabolism, amino acid metabolism, and fatty acid regulation pathways. Furthermore, through correlation analysis, it was found that there was a significant correlation between rumenococci in the cecum and amino acid metabolites in the muscle. Overall, these findings indicate that AM may affect the body's health by changing its gut microbiota, and then improving meat quality, and the intestinal-muscle axis provides a theoretical basis.

Indexed as

dietary fibergut microbiotameat qualitymetabonomicsrabbit

Identifiers

PMID35392295
PMCPMC8982513
OpenAlexW4221075564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.