Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35392038›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Identification of 9 Gene Signatures by WGCNA to Predict Prognosis for Colon Adenocarcinoma.

Mian Yang, Haibin He, Tao Peng, Yi Lu, Jiazi Yu

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mian YangDepartment of Colon Anorectal Surgery, Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo Medical Center, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Haibin HeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo Medical Center, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7170-8047
Tao PengDepartment of Colon Anorectal Surgery, Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo Medical Center, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Yi LuDepartment of Chemoradiotherapy, Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo Medical Center, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Jiazi YuDepartment of Colon Anorectal Surgery, Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo Medical Center, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8919-1178

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A risk assessment model for prognostic prediction of colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) was established based on weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). Methods: From the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, RNA-seq data and clinical data of COAD patients were retrieved. After screening of differentially expressed genes (DEGs), WGCNA was performed to identify gene modules and screen those associated with COAD progression. Then, via protein-protein interaction (PPI) network construction of module genes, hub genes were obtained, which were then subjected to the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and Cox regression to build a hub gene-based prognostic scoring model. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) was plotted for the optimal cutoff (OCO) of the risk score, based on which, patients were assigned to high or low-risk groups. Areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) were calculated, and model performance was visualized using Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves and verified in the external dataset GSE29621. Finally, the model's independent prognostic value was evaluated by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, and a nomogram was built. Results: Totally 2840 DEGs were screened from COAD dataset of TCGA, including 1401 upregulated ones and 1439 downregulated ones, which were divided into 10 modules by WGCNA. The eigenvalue of the black module was found to have a high correlation with COAD progression. PPI interaction networks were constructed for genes in the black module, and 34 hub genes were obtained by using the MCODE plug-in. A LASSO-Cox regression approach was utilized to analyze the hub genes, and a prognostic risk score model based on the signatures of 9 genes (CHEK1, DEPDC1B, FANCI, MCM10, NCAPG, PARPBP, PLK4, RAD51AP1, and RFC4) was constructed. KM analysis identified shorter overall lower survival in the high-risk group. The model was verified to have favorable predictive ability through training set and validation set. The nomogram, composed of tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging and risk score, was of good predictability. Conclusions: The COAD prognostic risk model constructed upon the signatures of 9 genes (CHEK1, DEPDC1B, FANCI, MCM10, NCAPG, PARPBP, PLK4, RAD51AP1, and RFC4) can effectively predict the survival status of COAD patients.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaColonic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksHumansBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID35392038
PMCPMC8983226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.