Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35391999›Full record

ArticleNagoya journal of medical science2022

<Editors' Choice> Evaluation of system-related magnetic resonance imaging geometric distortion in radiation therapy treatment planning: two approaches and effectiveness of three-dimensional distortion correction.

Yutaka Kato, Kuniyasu Okudaira, Takeshi Kamomae, Motoki Kumagai, Youta Nagai, Toshiaki Taoka, Yoshiyuki Itoh, Shinji Naganawa

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yutaka KatoDepartment of Radiological Technology, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Kuniyasu OkudairaDepartment of Radiological Technology, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Takeshi KamomaeDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Motoki KumagaiDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Youta NagaiDepartment of Radiological Technology, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Toshiaki TaokaDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Yoshiyuki ItohDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Shinji NaganawaDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Nagoya University · JPNagoya University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose two methods to evaluate system-related distortion in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiation therapy treatment planning (RTP) and demonstrate the importance of three-dimensional (3D) distortion correction (DC) by quantitatively measuring the distortion magnitude. First, a small pin phantom was scanned at multiple positions using an external laser guide for accurate phantom placement and combined into one image encompassing a large area. Direct plane images were used for evaluating in-plane distortion and multiplanar reconstruction images for through-plane distortion with no DC, two-dimensional (2D) DC, and 3D DC. Second, a large grid sheet was scanned as the direct plane of the phantom placement. The distortion magnitude was determined by measuring the displacement between the MRI and reference coordinates. The measured distortions were compared between in- and through-plane when applying DC and between the two methods. The small pin phantom method can be used to evaluate a wide range of distortions, whereas data from the entire plane can be obtained with a single scan using the grid sheet without a laser guide. The mean distortion magnitudes differed between the methods. Furthermore, the 3D DC reduced in- and through-plane distortions. In conclusion, the small pin phantom method can be used to evaluate a wide range of distortions by creating a combined image, whereas the grid sheet method is simpler, accurate, repeatable, and does not require a special-order phantom or laser guide. As 3D DC reduces both in- and through-plane distortions, it can be used to improve RTP quality.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingHumansPhantoms, Imagingdistortiondistortion correctionmagnetic resonance imagingradiation therapy treatment planningsystem-related distortion

Identifiers

PMID35391999
PMCPMC8971027
OpenAlexW4223449367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.