Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35391853›Full record

ArticlePain research & management2022

VAS and NRS, Same or Different? Are Visual Analog Scale Values and Numerical Rating Scale Equally Viable Tools for Assessing Patients after Microdiscectomy?

Joanna Bielewicz, Beata Daniluk, Piotr Kamieniak

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain research & management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 80 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06874959 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Control Trail: Evaluation of the Pain Relief Effect of Battlefield Acupuncture on Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Lumbar Spine Degeneration.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh CityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsSpondylosis LumbarArmsEar acupuncture, Electro-acupuncture, Paracetamol 500 mg, Sham ear acupuncture
NCT06918535 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Progressive Muscle Relaxation Vs Muscle Energy Technique on Nonspecific Neck Pain in Prolonged Computer Users. A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorIQRA UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsNeck Pain, Chronic Neck PainArmsProgressive Muscle Relaxation Technique, Muscle Energy Technique
NCT07659327 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effects Of Sahrmann's Versus McGill Exercise On Pain, Disability, And Range Of Motion In Patients With Non-Specific Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled42ConditionsNon-specific Low Back Pain (NSLBP)ArmsSahrmann's Exercises, McGill Exercises
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Comparison of analgesic treatments used for ankle sprains in the emergency department.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. The Impact of Hospice Care on the Prognosis, Quality of Life, and Emotional Well-being of Patients With Chronic Heart Failure.Journal of hospice and palliative nursing : JHPN : the official journal of the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association · 2025
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joanna BielewiczDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2211-7341
Beata DanilukInstitute of Psychology, Marie Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5125-2900
Piotr KamieniakDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4125-6582

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the viability of the numerical rating scale (NRS) and the visual analogue scale (VAS) as a pain assessment tools among a large cohort of patients who underwent microdiscectomy. Methods: Patients, who underwent microdiscectomy, were prospectively enrolled into the study and assessed using VAS and NRS for the back (NRS-B) and the leg (NRS-L), Short Form of McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) included Pain Rating Index (PRI) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) 1 day before and 1 month and 3 months after the procedure. Results: 131 patients were included in the study. NRS-L, NRS-B, VAS, and ODI were significantly lower ( Conclusion: The results showed that PI measurements by NRS-L/NRS-B and VAS mutually correlate and impair functionality evaluated by ODI (convergent validity) but in different modes (differential validity). NRS and VAS are not parallel scales and assess different aspects of pain. The measurement of NRS-L 1 month after microdiscectomy seems to give quick insight into the effectiveness of the procedure.

Indexed as

DiskectomyLumbar VertebraeDisability EvaluationHumansPainPain MeasurementTreatment OutcomeVisual Analog Scale

Identifiers

PMID35391853
PMCPMC8983264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.