ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Occlusion of Bilobulated Left Atrial Appendage Using the Dual-Watchman Technique: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Double Trouble: A Bifid Left Atrial Appendage Requiring a Double Lobe-and-Disk Device Approach.CASE (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Article
- Drop-shaped microgrooves guide unidirectional cell migration for enhanced endothelialization.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure with concomitant dual-device implantation: a single-center observational study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- WATCHMEN: a case report highlighting the closure of a bilobed left atrial appendage using two WATCHMAN-FLX devices.European heart journal. Case reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion has been considered an efficient alternative to oral anticoagulation to prevent embolic events in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Due to the complexities and heterogeneous anatomy of the LAA structure, the single-device approach may not always fit a large bilobulated LAA. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of one-stop dual Watchman implantation for patients with bilobulated LAA. Methods: Included in the analysis were patients who underwent complete LAA closure with dual Watchman devices between December 2015 and December 2021. The anatomic morphology, procedure characteristics, procedure safety, and procedural complications were analyzed. Cardiac CT or transesophageal ultrasound was obtained at 7 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-operatively to evaluate the effect of occlusion. Results: Among the 330 patients who underwent LAA occlusion during the study period, 7 (2.1%) patients were occluded with one-stop implantation of the double Watchman strategy. Successful occlusion was achieved in all patients. One patient had the double-access sheath strategy for implantation, and 6 patients had only a single-access sheath strategy for implantation. Pericardial effusion occurred in one case during the 7-day perioperative period. There was no device embolization, thrombosis, or obvious peridevice leakage (≥l mm) during the 2-year follow-up, with the exception of two cases with 2 mm of incomplete LAA sealing. Conclusion: The one-stop implantation of a dual Watchman is feasible and safe and might provide a strategy to occlude a large bilobulated LAA when incomplete closure is inevitable with a single device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.