Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35391772›Full record

ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2022

Automatic Localization and Brand Detection of Cervical Spine Hardware on Radiographs Using Weakly Supervised Machine Learning.

Raman Dutt, Dylan Mendonca, Huai Ming Phen, Samuel Broida, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Judy Gichoya, Imon Banerjee, Tim Yoon, Hari Trivedi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Fully automated pedicle screw manufacturer identification in plain radiograph with deep learning methods.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Raman Dutt *Department of Computer Science, Shiv Nadar University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India (R.D.); Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry (D.M.) and Department of Computer Science (M.G.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Departments of Radiology (H.M.P., S.B., J.G., T.Y., H.T.) and Biomedical Informatics (I.B.), Emory University, Atlanta, Ga.ORCID 0000-0002-1822-4315
Dylan Mendonca *Department of Computer Science, Shiv Nadar University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India (R.D.); Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry (D.M.) and Department of Computer Science (M.G.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Departments of Radiology (H.M.P., S.B., J.G., T.Y., H.T.) and Biomedical Informatics (I.B.), Emory University, Atlanta, Ga.ORCID 0000-0002-9090-5668
Huai Ming PhenDepartment of Computer Science, Shiv Nadar University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India (R.D.); Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry (D.M.) and Department of Computer Science (M.G.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Departments of Radiology (H.M.P., S.B., J.G., T.Y., H.T.) and Biomedical Informatics (I.B.), Emory University, Atlanta, Ga.
Samuel BroidaDepartment of Computer Science, Shiv Nadar University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India (R.D.); Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry (D.M.) and Department of Computer Science (M.G.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Departments of Radiology (H.M.P., S.B., J.G., T.Y., H.T.) and Biomedical Informatics (I.B.), Emory University, Atlanta, Ga.
Marzyeh GhassemiDepartment of Computer Science, Shiv Nadar University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India (R.D.); Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry (D.M.) and Department of Computer Science (M.G.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Departments of Radiology (H.M.P., S.B., J.G., T.Y., H.T.) and Biomedical Informatics (I.B.), Emory University, Atlanta, Ga.
Judy GichoyaDepartment of Computer Science, Shiv Nadar University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India (R.D.); Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry (D.M.) and Department of Computer Science (M.G.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Departments of Radiology (H.M.P., S.B., J.G., T.Y., H.T.) and Biomedical Informatics (I.B.), Emory University, Atlanta, Ga.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1097-316X
Imon BanerjeeDepartment of Computer Science, Shiv Nadar University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India (R.D.); Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry (D.M.) and Department of Computer Science (M.G.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Departments of Radiology (H.M.P., S.B., J.G., T.Y., H.T.) and Biomedical Informatics (I.B.), Emory University, Atlanta, Ga.ORCID 0000-0002-3327-8004
Tim YoonDepartment of Computer Science, Shiv Nadar University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India (R.D.); Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry (D.M.) and Department of Computer Science (M.G.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Departments of Radiology (H.M.P., S.B., J.G., T.Y., H.T.) and Biomedical Informatics (I.B.), Emory University, Atlanta, Ga.ORCID 0000-0003-1010-6952
Hari TrivediDepartment of Computer Science, Shiv Nadar University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India (R.D.); Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry (D.M.) and Department of Computer Science (M.G.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Departments of Radiology (H.M.P., S.B., J.G., T.Y., H.T.) and Biomedical Informatics (I.B.), Emory University, Atlanta, Ga.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6648-8334

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop an end-to-end pipeline to localize and identify cervical spine hardware brands on routine cervical spine radiographs. Materials and Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, patients who received cervical spine implants between 2014 and 2018 were identified. Information on the implant model was retrieved from the surgical notes. The dataset was filtered for implants present in at least three patients, which yielded five anterior and five posterior hardware models for classification. Images for training were manually annotated with bounding boxes for anterior and posterior hardware. An object detection model was trained and implemented to localize hardware on the remaining images. An image classification model was then trained to differentiate between five anterior and five posterior hardware models. Model performance was evaluated on a holdout test set with 1000 iterations of bootstrapping. Results: A total of 984 patients (mean age, 62 years ± 12 [standard deviation]; 525 women) were included for model training, validation, and testing. The hardware localization model achieved an intersection over union of 86.8% and an F1 score of 94.9%. For brand classification, an F1 score, sensitivity, and specificity of 98.7% ± 0.5, 98.7% ± 0.5, and 99.2% ± 0.3, respectively, were attained for anterior hardware, with values of 93.5% ± 2.0, 92.6% ± 2.0, and 96.1% ± 2.0, respectively, attained for posterior hardware. Conclusion: The developed pipeline was able to accurately localize and classify brands of hardware implants using a weakly supervised learning framework.

Indexed as

Convolutional Neural NetworkDeep Learning AlgorithmsMachine Learning AlgorithmsProsthesesSemisupervised LearningSpine

Identifiers

PMID35391772
PMCPMC8980883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.