ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2022
Quantification of the Thoracic Aorta and Detection of Aneurysm at CT: Development and Validation of a Fully Automatic Methodology.
Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated AI-Based Aortic Measurements From Attenuation Correction CT as an Adjunctive Cardiovascular Risk Biomarker: An International Multicenter Study.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Automatic detection and measurement system for aortic aneurysms using deep learning-based artificial intelligence.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Automated Aortic Quantification Based on Artificial Intelligence: Validation Using Contrast-Enhanced and Non-Contrast CT Scans from the Same Session.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Establishment of normative spleen volume in a Japanese cohort using automated CT segmentation: diagnostic implications for liver fibrosis.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-powered solutions for automated aortic diameter measurement in computed tomography: a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence Provides Accurate Quantification of Thoracic Aortic Enlargement and Dissection in Chest CT.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Assessing the role of an artificial intelligence assessment tool for thoracic aorta diameter on routine chest CT.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- A benchmark study of convolutional neural networks in fully automatic segmentation of aortic root.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Assessing the Accuracy of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Segmentation Algorithm for the Thoracic Aorta in Computed Tomography Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop and validate a deep learning-based system that predicts the largest ascending and descending aortic diameters at chest CT through automatic thoracic aortic segmentation and identifies aneurysms in each segment. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study conducted from July 2019 to February 2021, a U-Net and a postprocessing algorithm for thoracic aortic segmentation and measurement were developed by using a dataset (dataset A) that included 315 CT studies split into training, hyperparameter-tuning, and testing sets. The U-Net and postprocessing algorithm were associated with a Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine series filter and visualization interface and were further validated by using a dataset (dataset B) that included 1400 routine CT studies. In dataset B, system-predicted measurements were compared with annotations made by two independent readers as well as radiology reports to evaluate system performance. Results: In dataset B, the mean absolute error between the automatic and reader-measured diameters was equal to or less than 0.27 cm for both the ascending aorta and the descending aorta. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were greater than 0.80 for the ascending aorta and equal to or greater than 0.70 for the descending aorta, and the ICCs between readers were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.92) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.84), respectively. Aneurysm detection accuracy was 88% (95% CI: 86, 90) and 81% (95% CI: 79, 83) compared with reader 1 and 90% (95% CI: 88, 91) and 82% (95% CI: 80, 84) compared with reader 2 for the ascending aorta and descending aorta, respectively. Conclusion: Thoracic aortic aneurysms were accurately predicted at CT by using deep learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.