Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35391762›Full record

ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2022

Automated Identification and Measurement Extraction of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions from Free-Text Radiology Reports Using Natural Language Processing.

Rikiya Yamashita, Kristen Bird, Philip Yue-Cheng Cheung, Johannes Hugo Decker, Marta Nicole Flory, Daniel Goff, Linda Nayeli Morimoto, Andy Shon, Andrew Louis Wentland, Daniel L Rubin and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Based on Medicine, The Now and Future of Large Language Models.Cellular and molecular bioengineering · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rikiya YamashitaDepartments of Biomedical Data Science (R.Y., D.L.R.) and Radiology (K.B., P.Y.C.C., J.H.D., M.N.F., D.G., L.N.M., A.S., A.L.W., D.L.R., T.S.D.), Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2686-2333
Kristen BirdDepartments of Biomedical Data Science (R.Y., D.L.R.) and Radiology (K.B., P.Y.C.C., J.H.D., M.N.F., D.G., L.N.M., A.S., A.L.W., D.L.R., T.S.D.), Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305.
Philip Yue-Cheng CheungDepartments of Biomedical Data Science (R.Y., D.L.R.) and Radiology (K.B., P.Y.C.C., J.H.D., M.N.F., D.G., L.N.M., A.S., A.L.W., D.L.R., T.S.D.), Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305.
Johannes Hugo DeckerDepartments of Biomedical Data Science (R.Y., D.L.R.) and Radiology (K.B., P.Y.C.C., J.H.D., M.N.F., D.G., L.N.M., A.S., A.L.W., D.L.R., T.S.D.), Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0002-4143-2673
Marta Nicole FloryDepartments of Biomedical Data Science (R.Y., D.L.R.) and Radiology (K.B., P.Y.C.C., J.H.D., M.N.F., D.G., L.N.M., A.S., A.L.W., D.L.R., T.S.D.), Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0002-7253-8366
Daniel GoffDepartments of Biomedical Data Science (R.Y., D.L.R.) and Radiology (K.B., P.Y.C.C., J.H.D., M.N.F., D.G., L.N.M., A.S., A.L.W., D.L.R., T.S.D.), Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0003-2109-1696
Linda Nayeli MorimotoDepartments of Biomedical Data Science (R.Y., D.L.R.) and Radiology (K.B., P.Y.C.C., J.H.D., M.N.F., D.G., L.N.M., A.S., A.L.W., D.L.R., T.S.D.), Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305.
Andy ShonDepartments of Biomedical Data Science (R.Y., D.L.R.) and Radiology (K.B., P.Y.C.C., J.H.D., M.N.F., D.G., L.N.M., A.S., A.L.W., D.L.R., T.S.D.), Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305.
Andrew Louis WentlandDepartments of Biomedical Data Science (R.Y., D.L.R.) and Radiology (K.B., P.Y.C.C., J.H.D., M.N.F., D.G., L.N.M., A.S., A.L.W., D.L.R., T.S.D.), Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1736-8218
Daniel L RubinDepartments of Biomedical Data Science (R.Y., D.L.R.) and Radiology (K.B., P.Y.C.C., J.H.D., M.N.F., D.G., L.N.M., A.S., A.L.W., D.L.R., T.S.D.), Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5057-4369
Terry S DesserDepartments of Biomedical Data Science (R.Y., D.L.R.) and Radiology (K.B., P.Y.C.C., J.H.D., M.N.F., D.G., L.N.M., A.S., A.L.W., D.L.R., T.S.D.), Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0001-7983-9738

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To automatically identify a cohort of patients with pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) and extract PCL measurements from historical CT and MRI reports using natural language processing (NLP) and a question answering system. Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this retrospective Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study, and the requirement to obtain informed consent was waived. A cohort of free-text CT and MRI reports generated between January 1991 and July 2019 that covered the pancreatic region were identified. A PCL identification model was developed by modifying a rule-based information extraction model; measurement extraction was performed using a state-of-the-art question answering system. The system's performance was evaluated against radiologists' annotations. Results: For this study, 430 426 free-text radiology reports from 199 783 unique patients were identified. The NLP model for identifying PCL was applied to 1000 test samples. The interobserver agreement between the model and two radiologists was almost perfect (Fleiss κ = 0.951), and the false-positive rate and true-positive rate were 3.0% and 98.2%, respectively, against consensus of radiologists' annotations as ground truths. The overall accuracy and Lin concordance correlation coefficient for measurement extraction were 0.958 and 0.874, respectively, against radiologists' annotations as ground truths. Conclusion: An NLP-based system was developed that identifies patients with PCLs and extracts measurements from a large single-institution archive of free-text radiology reports. This approach may prove valuable to study the natural history and potential risks of PCLs and can be applied to many other use cases.

Indexed as

Abdomen/GIComputer Applications-General (Informatics)CystsInformaticsNamed Entity RecognitionPancreas

Identifiers

PMID35391762
PMCPMC8980879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.