ArticleIEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine2022
Design, Development and Validation of a Knee Brace to Standardize the US Imaging Evaluation of Knee Osteoarthritis.
Article in IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasound Phenotype-Based Approach to Treatment Choice in Osteoarthritis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Knee Osteoarthritis SCAENet: Adaptive Knee Osteoarthritis Severity Assessment Using Spatial Separable Convolution with Attention-Based Ensemble Networks with Hybrid Optimization Strategy.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Ultrasound Imaging in Knee Osteoarthritis: Current Role, Recent Advancements, and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Usability Assessment of Technologies for Remote Monitoring of Knee Osteoarthritis.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2024Article
- The ultrasound assessment of osteoarthritis: the current status.Skeletal radiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveA repeatable and reliable follow-up of knee injuries would be desirable to prevent delayed diagnosis and to monitor the efficacy of the applied treatment over time. Ultrasound (US) techniques are an attractive option to this purpose, since they are safe, low-cost and non-invasive. However, its use in the clinical practice is limited by the high dependency on the operator's experience. Hence, the objective of this study is to provide a standardization of the US image acquisition process for knee osteoarthritis (OA) allowing an extended clinical use of US technologies in this domain.
methodsClinical specifications were provided by expert musculoskeletal radiologists thus identifying the subject poses and the US probe positions needed to evaluate the cartilage structure, signs of synovitis and joint effusion. Such considerations were used to derive the technical requirements needed for the development of a wearable brace equipped with specific openings to guide the correct placement of the probe. The feasibility of the developed wearable brace was tested on three healthy volunteers, which were asked to acquire informative US images, similar to the reference images performed by the musculoskeletal radiologist.
resultsThanks to the knee brace, the untrained subjects were able to self-acquire informative B-mode images comparable to the corresponding images acquired by an expert clinician. DISCUSSION/
conclusionThe use of a knee brace intended for knee OA US diagnosis demonstrated the possibility to standardize the acquisition protocol and make its application achievable also for untrained subjects, representing a key step toward tele-ultrasonography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.