Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35391657›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular engineering and technology2022

Validating In Silico and In Vitro Patient-Specific Structural and Flow Models with Transcatheter Bicuspid Aortic Valve Replacement Procedure.

Salwa B Anam, Brandon J Kovarovic, Ram P Ghosh, Matteo Bianchi, Ashraf Hamdan, Rami Haj-Ali, Danny Bluestein

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular engineering and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Salwa B AnamBiofluids Research Group, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Brandon J KovarovicBiofluids Research Group, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Ram P GhoshBiofluids Research Group, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Matteo BianchiBiofluids Research Group, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Ashraf HamdanDepartment of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, 4941492, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Rami Haj-AliSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, 69978, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Danny BluesteinBiofluids Research Group, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA. danny.bluestein@stonybrook.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4014-2308
Stony Brook University · USRabin Medical Center · ILTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

Biomechanical Approaches and Technologies for Enhancing TAVR OutcomesU01EB026414 · NIBIB · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI BLUESTEIN, DANNY · 2018 to 2022
$3.8M
NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB026414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital cardiac malformation, which had been treated off-label by transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedure for several years, until its recent approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Conformité Européenne (CE) to treat BAVs. Post-TAVR complications tend to get exacerbated in BAV patients due to their inherent aortic root pathologies. Globally, due to the paucity of randomized clinical trials, clinicians still favor surgical AVR as the primary treatment option for BAV patients. While this warrants longer term studies of TAVR outcomes in BAV patient cohorts, in vitro experiments and in silico computational modeling can be used to guide the surgical community in assessing the feasibility of TAVR in BAV patients. Our goal is to combine these techniques in order to create a modeling framework for optimizing pre-procedural planning and minimize post-procedural complications. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatient-specific in silico models and 3D printed replicas of 3 BAV patients with different degrees of post-TAVR paravalvular leakage (PVL) were created. Patient-specific TAVR device deployment was modeled in silico and in vitro-following the clinical procedures performed in these patients. Computational fluid dynamics simulations and in vitro flow studies were performed in order to obtain the degrees of PVL in these models.

resultsPVL degree and locations were consistent with the clinical data. Cross-validation comparing the stent deformation and the flow parameters between the in silico and the in vitro models demonstrated good agreement.

conclusionThe current framework illustrates the potential of using simulations and 3D printed models for pre-TAVR planning and assessing post-TAVR complications in BAV patients.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisBicuspid Aortic Valve DiseaseTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAortic ValveComputer SimulationHumansHydrodynamicsTreatment Outcome3D printingAortic valveBicuspid aortic valve (BAV)Paravalvular leakage (PVL)Patient-specific computational modelingTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)

Identifiers

PMID35391657
PMCPMC12087951
OpenAlexW4226276159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.