ArticleCardiovascular engineering and technology2022
Validating In Silico and In Vitro Patient-Specific Structural and Flow Models with Transcatheter Bicuspid Aortic Valve Replacement Procedure.
Article in Cardiovascular engineering and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review of Modeling Platforms for Atrioventricular Valves in Atrioventricular Septal Defects.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Pooled it
- Strain-Based Assessment of Post-TAVR Left Bundle Branch Block in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Using Patient-Specific Computational Modeling.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Development of a Polymeric TAVR Device Tailored to Bicuspid Aortic Valve Patients Using In Silico Design Optimization and Evaluation.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Computational modelling for personalized transcatheter aortic valve replacement planning: a systematic review of complications and decision support.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Predicting procedural outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a scoping review of numerical patient-specific simulations.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2025Article
- A novel computational method to predict hypoattenuated leaflet thickening post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement using preprocedural computed tomography scans.JTCVS structural and endovascular · 2025Article
- Generation of a virtual cohort of TAVI patients for in silico trials: a statistical shape and machine learning analysis.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025Article
- The impact of bicuspid valve morphology on the selection of transcatheter aortic valve implantation devices: anEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
- Effect of Sinotubular Junction Size on TAVR Leaflet Thrombosis: A Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Regulatory science promotes the translation of transcatheter tricuspid valve repair/replacement devices.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Article
- Mild Paravalvular Leak May Pose an Increased Thrombogenic Risk in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) Patients-Insights from Patient Specific In Vitro and In Silico Studies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Designing a Novel Asymmetric Transcatheter Aortic Valve for Stenotic Bicuspid Aortic Valves Using Patient-Specific Computational Modeling.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionBicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital cardiac malformation, which had been treated off-label by transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedure for several years, until its recent approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Conformité Européenne (CE) to treat BAVs. Post-TAVR complications tend to get exacerbated in BAV patients due to their inherent aortic root pathologies. Globally, due to the paucity of randomized clinical trials, clinicians still favor surgical AVR as the primary treatment option for BAV patients. While this warrants longer term studies of TAVR outcomes in BAV patient cohorts, in vitro experiments and in silico computational modeling can be used to guide the surgical community in assessing the feasibility of TAVR in BAV patients. Our goal is to combine these techniques in order to create a modeling framework for optimizing pre-procedural planning and minimize post-procedural complications. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatient-specific in silico models and 3D printed replicas of 3 BAV patients with different degrees of post-TAVR paravalvular leakage (PVL) were created. Patient-specific TAVR device deployment was modeled in silico and in vitro-following the clinical procedures performed in these patients. Computational fluid dynamics simulations and in vitro flow studies were performed in order to obtain the degrees of PVL in these models.
resultsPVL degree and locations were consistent with the clinical data. Cross-validation comparing the stent deformation and the flow parameters between the in silico and the in vitro models demonstrated good agreement.
conclusionThe current framework illustrates the potential of using simulations and 3D printed models for pre-TAVR planning and assessing post-TAVR complications in BAV patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.